English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is obvious to me that most people hate George W. with his extremely low approval rating. Did you know that if you type miserable failure on google the first thing that comes up is a biography of George W.?
The time to pull out of Iraq came a long time ago, and the best thing we could do is just leave there asap. The fighting has been getting worse, and the only reason American soldiers die now is beacuse they get caught in the crossfire of current civil war there.

2006-12-18 18:08:01 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

I believe that George H Bush should have pulled out...........
of Barbara when GW was concieved.
What an utter lying failure of a rich mans son.

2006-12-18 19:21:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

We should never have gone into Iraq.. When we found no WMD we should have pulled out. We have succeeded in making martyrs out of fanatics, and making much more of the world hate us. How dare we give Saddam weapons (illegal ones at that), and then topple him and his government, and hunt him down like a dog? What is the REAL vision behind all of this? It's NOT just oil! Our country is seriously divided, and we look like fools. (And I'm not about to get on Dubya's war wagon to help unite the US, nor are most other peace-niks.)
We have left Iraq in turmoil, and I think that may have been the mission in the first place. All one needs to do is look at the film coming out of that country to know that those people are not on the same wave-lenght as we are. Do they even know how a "democracy" is supposed to work? The Iraqi people have a different mind set, coming from a much different background than present-day Americans. And they are children of violence. (I realize that the US is a violent country, but not in the same way.)
So, to answer your original question: ME.


edit

Wasn't it Iran that we bombed during the Old Bush days??

2006-12-18 18:45:06 · answer #2 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 1 1

First, it's a little early to claim we know how history will judge ANY modern president since Nixon.

Second, your analysis of Iraq certainly sounds like the results of an in-depth, on the ground investigation into the geopolitical struggle that is currently taking place in Iraq. I'm betting when you visited, you even left the Green Zone - NOT!

If we leave Iraq now, Iran gets it. When that happens, the Kurds revolt and declare Independent Kurdistan. Turkey invades to suppress the nationalistic leanings of their own large Kurdish population.

Now, if you want to be responsible for President Tom to get even more oil, and the deaths of millions of Kurds, then sure, we should leave tonight.

2006-12-18 18:14:43 · answer #3 · answered by jbtascam 5 · 0 1

Never should have invaded Iraq in the first place....and yes Bush is a failure and a miserable excuse for a human being!

2006-12-18 18:42:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

If I can recall the American soldiers left there before when Bill Clinton was President. When Clinton was President, he stated to the world that America would bomb them night and day until Iraq surrendered. America bombed Iraq for 17 days straight before Iraq surrendered. After the war was over Mr. Clinton told the American soldiers its time to go home. Congress hated Mr. Clinton for that. Thats why they had Mr. Clinton blackmaled. Congress wanted to assassinate Mr. Clinton for that, and if that was to happen, it would reveal the government. So congress had him impeached and removed from office. Then George W. showed up and sent American soldiers right back over there to Iraq. The American Government is like this. Do you remember 9/11? OK, the U.S. was attacked by Afghanistan. People will probably say different but I've done my research about 9/11 and its true. After the attack on 9/11 from Afghanistan why did George W. issued an attack on Iraq? Bush didn't go after the one who attacked America. And another thing, a country will not attack another country withour any probable causes. So why did they attack America? The media is only saying what the government wants them to say. The only thing that I see Bush is doing is getting our American soldiers killed over there. Our soldiers should be back at home with their families. Nevertheless Bush is setting America up for another fatil attack. Sorry for sounding so crude but I believe that is his intintion for America in the first place. Of course Bush will be the first one to leave for safety.

2006-12-18 18:37:43 · answer #5 · answered by George 4 · 0 1

Hey...geniuses..ever heard of the term "Googlebombing"? Thought not. Look it up.

This is your opinion, to run away from a problem. Unfortunately, a lot of people have not learned that you can not run from a problem. Especially one that has explosives and is planning to come to your home. Get a clue.

======================

And another thing, study a little history and you will find that this started decades ago, not with the current administration or the one before it. So start telling the truth and spread the blame evenly where it goes.

2006-12-18 18:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1 0

OK first.... do you really believe that bush ever had an original thought in his head??? i think you will find that daddy and various other "advisers" are behind 90 percent of all he comes up with. { have you forgotten rumsfeld} it was he who said that the first mandate is to keep the population frightened!! and the fact that he has already said that the troops WILL stay in iraq long after his term tells you something about the real people behind the scenes!! i dont think that a change of presidents is going to change much!!!

2016-03-13 08:24:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't believe we should leave. Not until we can make sure that Saddam will not be able to return to power. You see if we leave now there will be a revolt to have him regain his power. We do not want this. Because we removed him from power. We the United States, who do you think he will try to take revenge on for the removal and the killing of his sons. US do you know that means. That means he will be bringing the war to our backyard I don't want that. My family is safe because of all the men and women dying over there to keep the war out of my house. I thank them everyday and will continue to support them until each one is safely home with their families and you should do the same. The only reason you get to say the things you do is because these soldiers have given you the right to your freedom of speech. So don't take that lightly. You should thank them as well.

2006-12-19 05:14:06 · answer #8 · answered by Jorge's Wife 4 · 0 0

I do think he has failed the American people in many ways...and it's not that we should have pulled out of Iraq along time ago, it's more like we shouldn't have been there in the first place. Did you know he had Iraq war plans laid out before he even won the presidency? http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/156352_bushsummit13.html

2006-12-18 18:36:24 · answer #9 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 0 0

LOL! It's true for the Yahoo search engine, too. And we definitely should've pulled out. Bushitler has too big of a Messiah complex for that, though.

2006-12-18 18:11:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers