Sony playstation 3 is loaded and pricey, a computer would be cheaper and so would the games.
2006-12-18 15:47:07 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics ➔ Games & Gear
cant say yet, gotta give the console some time first before you can make that kinda statement, same goes with the people who woudl call it awesome, cant make that statement yet, gotta give it time before you can call it anythin
2006-12-18 18:43:48 · answer #1 · answered by kydd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sony dropped the ball in that it didn't make enough PS3 to meet the massive demands.
Sony dropped the ball with its sorry line of launch games.
Sony dropped the ball by making the 20 gb version which can't upgrade to equal the 60 gb. At least with the 360 core, you can upgrade it so that it's equivalent to the 360 premium.
Sony dropped the ball with it's stubbornness to not settle the lawsuit with Immersion, and let Immersion work with Sony to put in the rumble feature in the Sixaxis.
But I don't think Sony dropped the ball with the 600 price tag and loaded it with stuff because you get what you pay for. It's rather cheap for a video game console and a Blu-ray player. The PS3 is not even close to being a computer, maybe an e-machine for reading e-mails and web surfing.
2006-12-18 23:55:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say it is all worth it. You can first listen to music, play games, and watch videos. Next you can play with other people for free (Xbox has to pay with LIVE) and surf the internet for free as long as you have internet connection. It has the best graphics of all at 2 trillion pixels per second and runs at blu-ray technology (5x better than HD-DVD the one used on Xbox 360). Then has SIX-AXIS controller where say you were riding a dragon you can move your controller to move the dragon, you can drive a car by pointing the controller down and brake by pointing it up. Its not better than Wii but Xbox 360 doesnt even have a movable controller. All the controllers are wirelless and not wired. It is also 20x times faster than the PS2. Its the best.
2006-12-19 01:25:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What superdork said and ps3 wont ever have Halo 3 which means it wont have the most anticipated game ever. A computer does have better graphics then the ps3 and some have faster processors. You get more out of a computer too. And since the ps3 wont have Halo 3, it sucks.
2006-12-19 00:25:59 · answer #4 · answered by chingos91 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea but a computer doesnt hav as good grafics a the ps3 and sum games are only made for playstation...soo you av to think alot bout the advantages a ps3 has to a computer than the disadvantages....and so for youve found only two which are partially true...heres sum thins a PC dont hav:
*good grafics
*fast processors
*blu-ray compatible and others
2006-12-18 23:52:49 · answer #5 · answered by Answer-er-er 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The PS3 is a huge waste of money. Don't bother with it. Go with the Wii or 360 instead... AND to top it off, it doesn't even have some of the features that the other two have. What a joke...
2006-12-18 23:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by Amy 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
tell you the truth sony just wants to win the format war by introducing the blu-ray. they are competing with hd dvd
2006-12-18 23:50:37 · answer #7 · answered by aka true gamer 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋