Barack Obama. He may be inexperienced in Washington, but I believe for this upcoming election that may be a good thing. Hillary will have the same debts Bill did plus the ones she owes on her own.
I believe it is time to clean House, forgive the pun. Our legislators that have been in office have been trained and brought up in a culture of corruption in Washington politics. They have all sold out their representation to big business. I believe they all need to be fired, and replaced by fresh blood.
Political party affiliation has no bearing on it, when deciding on the lesser of two evils it is most important to remember both are evil.
I will be voting for the newest candidates without regard to party.
Maybe if politicians actually had a reason to worry about keeping their jobs, they would be more inclined to represent our interests, and less inclined to sell their legislation to the highest bidding corporate entities.
2006-12-18 19:41:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jack C 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
I see a lot of people choosing one or the other without thinking about their answers! Please Please Please don't chose our leaders based on popularity. That is exactly why the absolute worst people have become the leading candidates for BOTH parties. Seriously - look at the issues, watch the debates, listen to their speeches, and choose the candidate who best reflects your personal views. Not because she is the only woman in her party seeking the presidency, and the wife of a former president - or because he is black. That says nothing about the candidate him or herself - and come the final election the nation is stuck with choosing the lesser of two evils as has happened these last two (or more) presidential elections.
Right now I personally know very little about either Hillary or Barack. I do think both are overrated because of their unique backgrounds. After seeing Hillary serve as first lady, hearing many of her speeches, and her term in the Senate - I lean away from voting for her as I seriously doubt she shares my values. Barack - I know very little about where he stands - but still being a freshman in DC will work to his advantage as nobody trusts those career senators who've become entrenched in office.
2006-12-19 00:19:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by gshprd918 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton AND Barack Obama!
Clinton for Prez as she KNOWS that job inside & out,
and Obama for VP cuz he's great but still a newbie . . .
They'd make simply a dynamite team,
they'd balance eachothers strengths & weaknesses,
together they'd be unbeatable!
2006-12-19 05:15:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by taowhore 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Neither one we saw what Hillary was like when Bill was in office, Obama not enough experience.
2006-12-19 10:33:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by d3midway semi-retired 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Obama. I would not vote for Hillary as dog catcher of month.
Obama seems very intelligent & personable. Hillary grates on everyone's nerves that is not a staunch fan. She has trouble sticking with a view - wavers with public opinion.
I am not a fan of either's politics but would be more likely to vote Obama.
2006-12-19 00:24:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
If I have to choose...Barack Obama. He's less nauseating than Hillary Clinton.
2006-12-18 23:52:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Keiron 3
·
6⤊
3⤋
Obama, first of all because he is African American and I am sick of European Americans. I feel they should have stayed in Europe and the world would be a much better place, less slavery, less destruction of natural habitat, less murder of Native and Rightful Americans, less exploitation period. Secondly, I would choose Obama rather than Hillary due to the fact that she voted for the Iraq war, but in reality does not support it, or agree with it. I do not feel that she is very honest. She appears to say whatever she thinks will get her farther, also pretending to be moderate and against gay marriage, when, again, in reality she is not. I like Bill though. He sure beats the hell out of Bush. I think Bill should get a 3rd term. Either that or Bush should get Monica, because we all know that Bush gets pussy whenever he wants it, like all the other lying presidents before him.
2006-12-19 00:19:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by trey 1
·
0⤊
4⤋
Hillary Clinton....we need a woman president! Plus, I hardly even know Barack Obama......just got to find out about him couple months back.
2006-12-18 23:47:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by * TeXaS cHiCk * 5
·
1⤊
6⤋
OBAMA. He's newer to the scene than these old land barons that have been carving up the country . New blood, with little preconception on how to screw someone.
2006-12-19 03:31:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bad choices both...That would be one scary ticket. Condoms on
'holiday' trees again! Aah the good 'ol Clinton years...don't miss them. Barak...don't know him from a hole in a ground. But, if he can't take a joke about his ears...he would never last a whole presidential campaigne!
2006-12-18 23:57:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by L. B. 3
·
3⤊
3⤋