In this case ,"were" is the past subjunctive of the verb "be", appearing in statements expressing conditions that are clearly hypothetical or contrary to fact.
2006-12-18 14:49:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
0⤋
In this instance, it is a subjunctive form of the verb, to be. In other words, a human being cannot be a lion -- it's purely a fantasy, and as such, you would express the improbable form of the verb, which would be "I were" instead of the past tense, "I was" . So the English book is correct.
2006-12-18 23:15:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by gldjns 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they are missing the "a". It should read " I would roar, if I were a lion".
2006-12-18 22:50:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
WERE is used for plural or 2 or more objects while WAS is used for singular or only one object.
Hope it helps!
2006-12-18 22:46:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by JoAnn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The statement implies supposition ie, if you had been in an imaginary position what would you have done.So it would only be right to use,' I were.'
2006-12-18 23:20:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by jagusan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I were a tutor I would teach grammer
2006-12-18 22:46:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Were" is used with I, We, you &They and plural forms whereas "Was" is used with He, She, It and singular forms. Therefore we shall use 'were' with I.
2006-12-19 00:51:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lalita t 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eg. There was a cow at his home.
There were many cows at his home.
2006-12-18 23:24:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Laxmi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
were: If i were you............or Were you..........?
was: I was at the..............or She was...............
and yes, I would roar, if I were "a" lion is right
2006-12-18 22:53:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♀★sMiLe☆♀ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋