Same sex marriage?

Question

Without using religious arguments, describe the prohibition of same-sex unions as a moral issue. Provide a philosopher (Mill, Kant, Aristotle, Ross, Rawls, Baxter) whose theory provides an insight into this as a moral issue and discuss their answer to the questions of same-sex unions. Are they moral or immoral? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Just for the record, I'm an atheist, but I'm opposed to same-sex marriage.

Sorry, don't have a philosopher to quote (though I find it very interesting that few philosophers spoke for it, even in societies in which homosexuality was accepted), but I do think I have a valid non-religious argument, if your interested.

Every argument I've heard for same-sex marriage also supports Traditional marriage, polygamy and incest (among adults). So from the strict moral viewpoint, there is no exclusive argument for or against any form of adult relationship.

So one falls back on the next level - Community benefit. Do some or all of the forms of marriage support or deter from the benefit of the community. Many decisions fall into this level - Nudie-bars, alcohol, Pot, TV shows, even fashion. And, in my opinion, marriage. As such, the community decides on which form, and at what level, each of these will benefit the community while protecting the rights of the individual.

From the community standpoint, the primary goal of marriage has traditionally been the development of a core or nuclear family. Of course many marry without the intent to have children, but family formation is the genesis for most original commitments of couples. And commited couples are proven to be the strongest and most successful form of family unit. Community standards grew to support this, giving tax breaks to married couples and credits for children, insurance coverage, and protection under community property laws.

I support and encourage the intent of those community standards, which attempts to elevate the foundation of a core family, the hetero-sexual couple, as an essential and unique building block. Like hetero-couple marriage, other conditions such as same-sex commitments, commitments within the same genetic path, or commitments among a group, should be judged for their contribution to the community in the same manner. But the manner in which they are accepted or rejected in the community should not interfere with the core foundation of a family. This is done by keeping the union of the hetero-couple, marriage, unique to that form. Allowing other legally binding unions in forms other than marriage would be the best compromise, and has been acceptable when addressing multiple choices that are all morally valid.

Answer 2

The defination of marriage is a holy and legal agreement between a man & a woman, to provide ligitimacy for children & financial obligation should the man die. It is a legal agreement. Not just a religoius thing.
To make same sex marrige legal that would take the change of defination of the word marriage. Why not just pick another word for same sex unions? That would apease the conservatives and give the gays a legal and binding agreement in their commitment.

My concern is that marriage has become somewhat of a risk..most not lasting long. It makes me wonder why people bother with getting married. Why on earth would a gay couple want to join in a practice that isn't what it is concieved to be.?

Lets get rid of the moral and religious discussions and just choose a word for same sex commitments and get on with life.

My opinion is that marriage is for male and female and that is morally right. I am sorry I can't quote any philospoher other than myself

Answer 3

There is nothing wrong with same sex marriage, and I must say that I am annoyed at how people try to restrict such a legal bond to the opposite sex couples. If it were to be called something different then it would be like calling marriage between two people of the same race something else.

Answer 4

Marriage, opposite to three different solutions, isn't approximately procreation (nonetheless, we are fairly keen to maintain attempting to make a newborn if it makes them happy XP) and not the only assets of the christian or the different faith. Marriage is a promise of dedication and provides reward to the two events. i could like my dating to be regarded, i desire to be acknolodged and given each and all of the rights that a guy could get in my place. 2 human beings in a loving, committed dating is a marriage. we are already getting married and have been by using fact the commencing up of the human race. suitable now we in simple terms want the healthcare and social and criminal reward that would desire to circulate with it. <3

Answer 5

firstly since a gay marriage has nothing to do with me i don't care let 'im get married if they want as for what to call it, then call it a "union" or some such if folks want to piss and moan about it that much. the way i see it people who have this much of a problem about this kind of thing need hobbies or at least more problems so they don't have the time to fuss about how the other half lives

Answer 6

you`re born with free will you can choose many things in life,that
don`t make it right. there are natural laws. it takes a man and a woman to procreate, any thing else don`t work.so if you choose to go against natural laws you`ll have to see just what comes your way. we reap what we sow and karma will come an get u.