If all the countries in the world were to stop making social, economic, and technological progress......???

Question

If all the countries in the world were to stop making social, economic, and technological progress, how would that negatively affect the world? would there be a negative effect at all?

Answer 1

That would change everything! The goal of life in America would no longer be to generate more wealth. I think our whole way of living would have to be restructured.

Not making progress socially would create alot of tension and frustration. Those who deserve an equal shot might not get it.

Technologically, I guess we could make do.

But I hope that we would slow things down and manage our resources better, pay attention to the environment etc. Save something for the next generation.

Answer 2

From finding over the previous 60 years or so of yank dominance in international affairs it appears that evidently positively actual that usa is a pirana of a usa which keeps to prey upon the weakest of international locations whilst thinking constantly approximately American earnings. One occasion out of thousands is the plight of Bolivia: - American massive corporation took over the water amenities of Bolivia's third best city. It tripled the cost for water in the present day and lobbied for rules that compelled human beings to apply their water and not get it from different ingredients. This corporation is risk-free by "American interests". -usa runs a extensive commerce imbalance with this economically disadvantaged usa sucking hundreds of thousands of greenbacks out of Bolivia each and each 12 months. i've got not got the source for this suggestions in front of me perfect now yet all and sundry that disagrees can look it up. factors TO contemplate: -Iran has not invaded any usa in 2 hundred years. Please evaluate this with the U. S.. -the united kingdom and the U. S. conspired to overthrow the democratic Iranian government in 1953 - The CIA terrorists did the job throwing Iran returned into tirany for some years under the harsh, American backed Shah of Iran. - interior the 80s the yankee puppet and CIA asset Saddam of Iraq went to conflict on Iran with US protection stress advisers giving Iraq undercover agent satellite tv for pc suggestions on Iranian troop movements. Iraq gassed and killed 3,000 Iranian troops with preparation from the U. S. advisers. the U. S. additionally helped finance the conflict. it extremely is understood that Iraq could not have produced the poison gas at that element nor an precise transport equipment. This seems to leave the individuals keeping the bag. - Iran did not take hostage of the yankee Embassy -- an intensive team did. This became not an Iranian attack, although deserved, by Iran. Gee, you comprehend, why might Iran have extremely a dislike for usa? Hmmm.