English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061218/ts_nm/usa_iraq_report_dc_2

Or should we be rude and not thank him?

2006-12-18 11:47:57 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Or is the Pentagon report the work of commie lib terrorist lovers?

Or reality?

2006-12-18 11:49:40 · update #1

yupchagee -

"How can one destabilize that which was never stable?"

Excellent argument for never having invaded in the first place. Thanks!

What's the point? Right?

2006-12-18 12:04:32 · update #2

18 answers

I think it would be a good idea for everybody to line up to go and tell him how much we appreciate him for making us the worlds biggest terrorists

2006-12-18 11:53:29 · answer #1 · answered by Enigma 6 · 2 2

Wow. What college district is that? Presidnet George W. Bush prosecuted the conflict in Iraq for multiple reasons. the single maximum widley understand and least understood, advert to do with weapons of Mass Destruction. maximum folk think of that the belief became to circulate inot Iraq and locate vats of weaponized botulism or in simple terms about finished nuclear instruments. particularly much less concrete--Iraq had made consistent efforts to stymie inspections and had on no account provided an entire accounitng of their WMD components. there have been such components that have been in many situations occurring to be in Iraq in 1992 and in 1998, by making use of 2002, the question became what had occurred to those materails--what were destroyed and how, the place have been they, ought to any of it relatively is ordinary? Hussein had additionally given lots help and help to terrorists. We were engaged in Afghanistan for in simple terms approximately a three hundred and sixty 5 days and it became in many situations occurring that al Qaeda contributors have been fleeing--between the secure havens they have been fleeing to became Iraq--partly the invasionwa approximately denying those havens and combating help to different terror communities besides suhc as Hamas and Hezbollah.

2016-10-15 05:03:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In case you don't know this, the Middle east was already destabilized before we went over ther. It was destabilized befor the first Bush administration took us over there. Do some research, learn your history.

2006-12-18 11:52:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

The middle east has been destabilized for thousands of years, if anyhing bush is just speeding it up a little.

2006-12-18 11:51:03 · answer #4 · answered by Brendan L 2 · 4 2

There is no civil war. Quit reiterating the liberal talking points. Iran and Syria have sent in fighters to destabilize Iraq and it is partly working.

2006-12-18 11:50:51 · answer #5 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 3 3

there is nothing inherently virtuous about stability. some of the most brutal dictatorships are the most stable and we overthrow our government every four years (if we want).

2006-12-18 19:32:09 · answer #6 · answered by karl k 6 · 0 0

It's all mind over matter

We don't mind, cause the rest of the world don't matter.

2006-12-18 12:02:19 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

how about Iran, with Iraq on one side and Afghanistan on the other,
Hmm

2006-12-18 11:58:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Patience please. It could take decades or even centuries 'til all the Muslims of the world put aside their sectarian differences and declare war on the U.S.

2006-12-18 11:57:08 · answer #9 · answered by socrates 6 · 2 0

Shhhhh, it's his secret plan, the terrorists are killing each other off, that's why there is no hurry to leave.

2006-12-18 11:59:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers