I wonder why they are continuing to go forward with more trials for Hussein when he has already been sentenced to death in his last trial. I understand that the appeals process must go forward on the first trial but I don't understand why there are subsequent trials. All of the trials (or upcoming trials) all include a sentence of death. They can only put him to death once. Why continue? Just wondering what others thoughts are on this. Thanks for the input!
2006-12-18 11:11:23 · 3 answers · asked by Tiggers 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
tHEY ARE CONTINUING JUST IN CASE THE OTHER TRIAL ARE SOMEHOW OVERTURNED DURING THE APPEALS PROCESS. tHE MORE CONVICTIONS HE HAS THE LESS LIKELY ALL OF THEM WILL BE OVERTURNED DURING APPEALS. ONE OF THEM HAS TO STICK.
2006-12-18 11:19:38 · answer #1 · answered by sofiedriskell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no more trials, they are now in the process of appealing the sentence, after that process is concluded, the sentence is carried out if the court of appeals ratify it..âº
2006-12-18 20:50:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
well just in case.
2006-12-18 22:24:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋