English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

No. The Duckworth-Lewis method is ONLY for one day matches and is NEVER used in first class cricket (matches with two innings per side).

The method is a statistical formula which is used to determine a target score for the team batting second if the the match is shortened by rain or bad light.

It was devised in 1998 by two English mathematicians called Duckworth and Lewis, and although it is quite complicated it is considered to produce fair and reasonable targets. You'll find a full explanation of how it works here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duckworth-Lewis_method

2006-12-18 23:22:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Duckworth-Lewis Method is only applied for One Day International Matches and not for Test Matches.

The Duckworth-Lewis method (D/L method) is a way to calculate the target score for the team batting second in a one-day cricket match interrupted by weather or other circumstance. It is generally accepted to be a fair and accurate method of setting a target score.

The D/L method was devised by two statisticians, Frank Duckworth and Tony Lewis in 1998, and has been adopted by the International Cricket Council as the standard method of calculating target scores in shortened one-day matches.

Previous methods used to achieve the same task included the use of run-rate ratios, the use of the score that the first team had achieved at the same point in their innings, and the use of targets derived by totalling the best scoring overs in the initial innings.

All of these methods have flaws that are easily exploitable. Run-rate ratios, for example, do not account for how many wickets the team batting second have lost, but simply reflect how quickly they were scoring at the point the match was interrupted. Thus if a team felt a rain stoppage was likely, they could attempt to force the scoring rate without regard for the corresponding highly likely loss of wickets, skewing the comparison with the first team. The other methods have similar flaws; these flaws are not present, or at least effectively normalized, by the D/L method.

The D/L method is relatively simple to apply, but requires a published reference table and some simple mathematical calculation. As with most non-trivial statistical derivations, however, the D/L method can produce results that are somewhat counterintuitive, and the announcement of the derived target score can provoke a good deal of second-guessing and discussion amongst the crowd at the cricket ground. This can also be seen as one of the method's successes, adding interest to a "slow" rain-affected day of play.

The essence of the D/L method is "resources". Each team is taken to have two "resources" to use to make as many runs as possible: the number of overs they have to receive; and the number of wickets they have in hand. At any point in any innings, a team's ability to score more runs depends on the combination of these two resources. Looking at historical scores, there is a very close correspondence between the availability of these resources and a team's final score, a correspondence which D/L exploits.

Using a published table which gives the percentage of these combined resources remaining for any number of overs (or, more accurately, balls) left and wickets lost, the target score can be adjusted up or down to reflect the loss of resources to one or both teams when a match is shortened one or more times. This percentage is then used to calculate a target (sometimes called a "par score") that is usually a fractional number of runs. If the second team passes the target then the second team is taken to have won the match; if the match ends when the second team has exactly met (but not passed) the target (rounded down to the next integer) then the match is taken to be a tie.

The published table that underpins the D/L method is regularly updated, most recently in 2004, as it became clear that one-day matches were achieving significantly higher scores than in previous decades, affecting the historical relationship between resources and runs.

At the same time as this update, the D/L method was also split into a Professional Edition and a Standard Edition[1]. The main difference is that while the Standard Edition preserves the use of a single table and simple calculation -- suitable for use in any one-day cricket match at any level -- the Professional Edition uses substantially more sophisticated statistical modeling, and requires the use of a computer. The Professional Edition has been in use in all international one-day cricket matches since early 2004.

A simple example of the D/L method being applied was the first one-day International between India and Pakistan in their 2006 series. India batted first, and were all out in the 49th over for 328. Pakistan, batting second, were 7 wickets down for 311 when bad light stopped play after the 47th over.

This is a relatively uncontroversial example, because with three full overs left to play (18 balls) and three wickets in hand, most cricket fans would agree that Pakistan would be almost certain to close the 17-run gap and take the match. In fact, application of the D/L method showed that at the end of the 47th over, the target was 304, so the result of the match is officially listed as "Pakistan won by 7 runs (D/L Method)"

For more information about D/L Method, please check the following link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duckworth-Lewis_method#Application

2006-12-18 15:03:10 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 2 0

Test cricket and all other "first class" matches cannot be decided by the D/L system.

Duckworth/Lewis is only used in one day matches to decide the winner when play is interupted by rain, bad light, etc.

2006-12-19 09:27:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no Duckworth - Lewis in test matches

2006-12-18 16:53:34 · answer #4 · answered by john 7 · 0 0

I think the DL method is a way of working out the required runs/wickets to win a game, when it has been interrupted by rain/bad light etc, and playing time has been reduced. I'm pretty sure it only relates to one day games!

2006-12-18 08:55:07 · answer #5 · answered by Stephen H 2 · 1 0

D/L is only used in one day matches - which by definition are "limited over" matches.
D/L is designed to "force" a result in a match that is interupted by rain, bad light etc.

Theoretically you cannot draw a one-day game, but it can be tied (subtle difference, I know).

D/L is very controversial and is often "tweaked" to adjust for prior weaknesses.

2006-12-18 08:57:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no its only for ODI

2006-12-18 22:46:26 · answer #7 · answered by marke 2 · 0 0

try google

2006-12-18 08:55:34 · answer #8 · answered by pinkpoodle 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers