Remembering that Christ is the Prince of Peace and thus the father of all peaceniks. Email me if you would like the scriptural references about Christ's love for peace.
2006-12-18 07:52:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes.
Great point, though you will never get a Bible Thumper to admit you are right.
Jesus was a liberal.
2006-12-18 07:55:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Jesus is the father of all, and many "peaceniks" are athiests, and so for that group to claim Jesus is a bit of a mockery.
Your assumption is that people who support war (or the current war) would also want a clearly innocent individual killed. There is no basis for that assumption. Saddam Hussein was not Jesus. He and his sons and his regime managed to keep Iraq "together" through a harsh authoritarian regime based on death and torture. Was it the right war for the US to fight? No, not at all. But let's not equate supporting this war or war in general with wishing to crucify an innocent man.
2006-12-18 07:59:48 · answer #2 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
i could be between neither team. The Romans crucified him, and that i'm no longer Roman. He had a following of people who minimally understood the training of their faith, and that i be attentive to extra approximately it than they, so i does no longer be between them. you're saying you attempt to maintain on with all of G-d's commandments, yet that's not precisely actual, somewhat, you attempt to maintain on with those which prepare to you. There are 613 commandments which G-d gave the Jews. you're saying you preserve on with the commandment to no longer have any G-d different than the G-d of Abraham, yet by ability of deifying Jesus, you're immediately violating that commandment. that's the fact as consistent with my non secular perception.
2016-12-11 11:38:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you imply that Jesus would have been marching around with you hippies, you're nuts.
What peacebots fail to realize is that conservatives love peace as much as libs do, and a lack of war does not equal peace. There cannot BE peace when you tolerate a madman like Saddam.
Also I note the massive hypocrisy one must have to dislike religion and wish to remove it from public view and then claim "Jesus was a liberal." Ridiculous.
2006-12-18 07:56:02 · answer #4 · answered by C = JD 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Never stated I wanted anyone killed for being a peacenik. Now treasonous terrorist sympathizer is another story!
2006-12-18 07:56:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Lets break down your analysis. Republicans are what you are referring to. Republicans are conservatives. Conservatives tend to be Christians, mostly Catholic. As you may know Catholics hold Jesus and his mother close to there hearts.
2006-12-18 08:02:33 · answer #6 · answered by only p 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
War lovers? Only a moron loves war. Don't be stupid.
Wanna try again?
2006-12-18 08:11:42 · answer #7 · answered by Jadis 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Other than Islamo-nutjobs, who actually loves war?????
Are you talking about those of us that got tired of being attacked by Islamic creps, and are glad that we are now at least fighting back? You are mistaken if you think we "love war".
As to the "peacenicks" I have only this to say.
"Tolerant" liberals/peacenicks(who are actually more violent than most) are the LEAST tolerant people around. Their statement can be reduced to "Your beliefs are fine, as long as they don't include the belief that my beliefs are wrong. However, MY belief that YOU are wrong must not only be tolerated, but accepted and supported by all."
2006-12-18 07:56:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
Very doubtful. Now Bush is getting blamed for killing Jesus.
2006-12-18 07:54:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Yep, same spirit moves them.
2006-12-18 07:55:06 · answer #10 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋