If not for the Kansas-Nebraska Act, would the Missouri Compromise have worked as a long term strategy?

Question

The Whig stance supported by guys like Henry Clay and Abraham Lincoln was to contain slavery and let it die/suffocate over time - would that have worked? Could the Civil War have been avoided? If not, how long do you think hostilities would have held off if not for the Kansas-Nebraska Act?

Answer 1

I do not believe the Missouri Compromise would have worked; the fact that the 1850 compromise was necessary reveals that it was already breaking down. It would have been impossible to manage the division between slave and free state for long; the Fugitive Slave Law and the Dred Scott decision reveal only two of the many cracks that made the Missouri Compromise unworkable.

Answer 2

The Kansas-Nebraska act was a result of the weakness of the Missouri Compromise. It did not come from no where and wreak havoc. I hate to say that anything in history is preordained but the sectional conflict between North and South is a good example of something that seemed to be building for a long time. Also included in this sectional conflict is the friction between state governments and the Federal government and which was to be superior. More than anything else establishing the primacy of the Federal government is the lasting effect of the Civil War.

Answer 3

2 is unquestionably the Kansas-Nebraska Act. ok and N have been in the previous certain unfastened territories below the Missouri Compromise (1820), because of the fact the two are north of Missouri's southern border. while the ok-N Act made them open to the two slavery or freedom by common vote, it spark off a hurry of idealists from the two aspects to settle the territories and verify them for his or her respective component. This introduced approximately the phenomenon of 'Bleeding Kansas', wherein bands of the two professional-slave and abolitionist settlers could attack one yet another to swing the inhabitants in prefer of their component. a million is okay-N additionally. the define is inapt, because of the fact it incredibly only introduced outrage from northern abolitionists, because of the fact the territories were certain unfastened earlier the Act, and now could desire to probably pass slave. yet only the ok-N A positioned the slavery question as much as common sovereignty (vote).

Answer 4

it wouldnt work because the states formed in the north out numbered the ones that would have adopted slavery.