English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-18 06:51:53 · 12 answers · asked by david d 1 in Society & Culture Holidays Christmas

12 answers

Old Crommy, as others say. He and the puritans had no sense of fun what so ever. Much like the self righteous prats these days.
Charles "That Cheeky Lad"
Merry Christmas one and all! Screw the Gits!

2006-12-18 09:30:58 · answer #1 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 1 0

Nobody has actually banned christmas but it should be as it is a complete waste of time and only the crooks and conmen who own the shops and internet sites have any use for it, they can sell things that are only worth 5p for £100 and some stupid mug will buy it.

2006-12-18 15:01:02 · answer #2 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 0 1

Oliver Cromwell - well he didn't Ban Christmas he just banned all the celebrations such as drinking and throwing parties as he thought that we were loosing sight of the true meaning of Christmas! which is kinda true as who actually thinks about Jesus being born and God on Christmas! Maybe he was right? well i dunno but i love Christmas and i don't exactly believe in God and that Jesus was the Son of God but I can see where he's coming from!
xXx

2006-12-22 11:08:11 · answer #3 · answered by love is a beautiful thing 1 · 0 0

Cromwell and the Puritans, but it was for more than one year, I think some laws still haven't been repealed today. For instance it is still illegal to eat mince pies or Christmas pudding at Christmas.

2006-12-18 15:05:53 · answer #4 · answered by AndyB 5 · 0 0

Oliver Cromewell

2006-12-19 07:03:59 · answer #5 · answered by The Dude 2 · 0 0

i believe Cromwell generally takes the blame but, if you put 'Cromwell Christmas' into a search engine you'll get more details..

"Cromwell did not personally abolish Christmas, though he was one of the much broader Godly or parliamentary party which tried – with, it appears, limited success – to clamp down on the celebration of Christmas and other saints’ and holy days during the mid seventeenth century. ....."

2006-12-18 14:56:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would love to ban christmas for myself- i loathe it. I'm not religious, it comes at a bleak time of year, the shops are mad, everyone's stressed, it costs too much money.

However, some people love it, so let them enjoy it. I am trying to cancel it for myself but always get dragged in to it somehow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_controversies

2006-12-18 14:57:50 · answer #7 · answered by brainlady 6 · 0 1

Not clever, obviously Mr O. Cromwell!! Durrrr

2006-12-18 19:54:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Once Upon A Time, When Christmas Was Banned...

Outlawing the celebration of Christmas sounds a little extreme, but it happened. The ban existed as law for only 22 years, but disapproval of Christmas celebration took many more years to change. In fact, it wasn't until the mid-1800s that celebrating Christmas became fashionable in the Boston region.

The Puritans who immigrated to Massachusetts to build a new life had several reason for disliking Christmas. First of all, it reminded them of the Church of England and the old-world customs, which they were trying to escape. Second, they didn't consider the holiday a truly religious day. December 25th wasn't selected as the birth date of Christ until several centuries after his death. Third, the holiday celebration usually included drinking, feasting, and playing games - all things which the Puritans frowned upon. One such tradition, "wassailing" occasionally turned violent. The older custom entailed people of a lower economic class visiting wealthier community members and begging, or demanding, food and drink in return for toasts to their hosts' health. If a host refused, there was the threat of retribution. Although rare, there were cases of wassailing in early New England. Fourth, the British had been applying pressure on the Puritans for a while to conform to English customs. The ban was probably as much a political choice as it was a religious one for many.


"For preventing disorders, arising in several places within this jurisdiction by reason of some still observing such festivals as were superstitiously kept in other communities, to the great dishonor of God and offense of others: it is therefore ordered by this court and the authority thereof that whosoever shall be found observing any such day as Christmas or the like, either by forbearing of labor, feasting, or any other way, upon any such account as aforesaid, every such person so offending shall pay for every such offence five shilling as a fine to the county."

From the records of the General Court,
Massachusetts Bay Colony
May 11, 1659


Records indicate the first Christmas the Puritans celebrated in the new world passed uneventfully. Some of the new settlers celebrated Christmas while others did not. But the events of the second Christmas were documented by the group's governor, William Bradford. Sickness had wiped out many of their group, and for the first time they were facing hostility by one of the Native American tribes in the area. Bradford recorded that on the morning of the 25th, he had called everyone out to work, but some men from the newly arrived ship "Fortune" told him it was against their conscience to work on Christmas. He responded he would spare them "until they were better informed." But when he returned at noon, he found them playing games in the street. His response, as noted in his writings was: "If they made the keeping of it matter of devotion, let them kepe their houses, but there should be no gameing or revelling in the streets."

That second Christmas was the first time the celebration was forbidden in Massachusetts, but the ban didn't make it into the law books until several years later. As the settlement grew and more English settled in the area, tensions grew between the Puritans and British. The more pressure the English king exerted on the colonists, the more they resisted. In 1659, the ban became official. The General Court banned the celebration of Christmas and other such holidays at the same time it banned gambling and other lawless behavior, grouping all such behaviors together. The court placed a fine of five shillings on anyone caught feasting or celebrating the holiday in another manner.


"The generality of Christmas-keepers observe that festival after such a manner as is highly dishonourable to the name of Christ. How few are there comparatively that spend those holidays (as they are called) after an holy manner. But they are consumed in Compotations, in Interludes, in playing at Cards, in Revellings, in excess of Wine, in mad Mirth ..."

- Reverend Increase Mather, 1687


The ban was revoked in 1681 by an English-appointed governor Sir Edmund Andros, who also revoked a Puritan ban against festivities on Saturday night. But even after the ban was lifted, the majority of colonists still abstained from celebrations. Samuel Sewell, whose diary of life in Massachusetts Bay Colony was later published, made a habit of watching the holiday - specifically how it was observed each year. "Carts came to town and Shops open as is usual. Some, somehow, observe the day; but are vexed, I believe, that the Body of the People profane it, - and, blessed be God! no Authority yet to compell them to keep it," Sewell wrote in 1685.

2006-12-18 15:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by madhairyscotsman 2 · 2 0

father chrisrmas

2006-12-18 21:08:43 · answer #10 · answered by nipper 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers