did they just not include them in the constitution.thanks
2006-12-18 06:39:55 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They didn't deal with political parties, in fact early on there were many political parties.
2006-12-18 06:41:37 · answer #1 · answered by feanor 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The framers were the parents of modern political parties. There was the Federalist(Nationalist) and Anti-federalist(True Federalist) political movements.
Most of these parties were so stone age that they had physical brawls in the halls of Congress.
2006-12-18 14:48:43 · answer #2 · answered by IRunWithScissors 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
In number 51 of the Federalist Papers, James Madison writes that, “It is evident that each department must have a will of its own.”
Whenever the same political party holds power in both the legislative and executive branches, the free will among the departments disolves. This can be very dangerous.
2006-12-18 14:43:03 · answer #3 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They didn't. It just wasn't an issue for America at the time. Political parties gained importance afterwards.
2006-12-18 14:42:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The wig party wanted an oak frame, while the federalists wanted cherry. They ended up using mahogany as a compromise.
2006-12-18 14:44:14 · answer #5 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They were hoping there would not be any. They hoped that the best men would be chosen to run.
2006-12-18 15:34:56 · answer #6 · answered by dem_dogs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
outlawed them
2006-12-18 14:41:54 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋