FOXNEWS.COM reports today "Deficit Surges to All-Time High" do we blame Clinton for this or do we blam

Question

FOXNEWS.COM reports today "Deficit Surges to All-Time High", do we blame Clinton for this too or do we just point the finger at all Dems even though the Repubs had the power since Clintons final term?

Answer 1

Bush has been more wasteful with taxpayer's money than any democrat. That is part of the gross hipocracy of the Republicans. As a Conservative, I stopped supporting these incompetent and corrupt wasteful overspenders years ago.

I believe in small government, The republicans set up the biggest government buerocracy in the history of the republic. Political correctness has gone mad!!! Christmas trees banned at christmas cos it might offend a few jews??? well tough! it's Christmas! I will not call it 'the holidays' and I will not celebrate any other religion's holy day as I am NOT an adherednt to their perverted view of the world! as Jews will not abandon Hanukkah, Hindus will not abandon Diwali, so I will not abandon Christmas!

That's freedom isn't it! FREEDOM, something I support and something that successive Governments of both colors have slowly rescinded up until now. I read with horror how the USA meets the 14 classic indicators of a fascist Government!

it spies on it's citizens, it can arrest and detain and torture anyone it wishes without having to put them before a court. It can invade your property and sieze any item it wishes, it can use emminent domain to steal your property to sell to developers and shortly you will have to have and show an ID card. papers please?

No longer a free nation, the republicans have wasted trillions of dollars to create a totalitarian judeo-fascist state.

I'll bet the GOP faithful, (A tiny and shrinking minority of people) will still blame Clinton though.

Answer 2

Since economies of all kinds are cyclical in nature and they cycle from good to bad and back again, how can you blame any one individual? The purse strings for the government are actually controlled by the House of Representatives which means we have to blame them. As the republican's have controlled the House for the last 20 years or so it is their fault if you MUST place fault. No money can really be spent until the House (and Senate) approve of the expenditure. Bush has asked for more money than any recent president and has received more for his personal vendetta's than any other has. The current financial state is due to the republican's vast amount of spending and not tightening the purse strings on either Clinton or Bush. There is documented evidence that Clinton had reversed the federal deficit and did have it going down instead of up but now Bush has managed to increase significantly the deficit.

Who do you blame? Bush seems to be a clear cut choice esp. if you consider Congress and their open pens for anything Bush wants ...or wanted.

Answer 3

There are two ways to approach a problem, (1) first, assign blame, and (2) look for a solution. If the deficit is a problem you want to address, consider what government expenditures you would wish to eliminate.

For example: Aid to people who refused to leave New Orleans when there was early and adequate storm warning? That might be just, but not quite humane. Another area where money was spent that really was not necessary might be the enormous settlements given to family and survivors of the 9/11 attacks. The taxpayers of the US might not have had a real obligation to make those payments, but it would have been difficult to stand up in Congress and say "no" without looking heartless and mean. If you go over the federal budgets, you will find thousands of places where money could be trimmed, but ask your congressman about it. He will explain how difficult it is to dismiss the pet projects of his constituents.

Answer 4

a lot of solutions mistake funds deficit with the business equipment. Bush inherited a funds the position authorities sales exceeded debt funds. on the time, a recession replaced into drawing near and so Bush, cavalierly postponed it with the help of providing tax cuts and rebates to the known public, even although usually to the better tax brackets. i replaced right into a severe college senior then. Me and my acquaintances used to snicker a lot when we said Bush's tax decrease. We, higschool little ones, knew then that basically a very ignorant man or woman would ever trust that a recession would nicely be ameliorated with the help of tax rebates. We anticipated inflation would save on with. fortunate for Bush, 9/11 befell and all the foreseeable economic problems of the recession compounded with the reaction to the attack, hence protecting Bush's irresponcible coverage. Bush persevered deficit spending interior the Keynsian custom, yet he did so at the same time as slicing social spending, thereby turning out to be debt with out making an investment in a extra effective extra equitable society for the destiny. at the same time as huge protection spending has some means to assist the business equipment with out generating a lot inflation, it also has a tendency to empty the business equipment after many years. Given the irresponsible habit of the U. S. interior the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions, global investors have started to lose faith interior the steadiness human beings coverage. Irresponsible protection spending and tax cuts are what again the U. S. gov. into deficit spending. i'm not an enemy of deficit spending. i imagine it may be a efficient approach no matter if that is used sparingly. I also imagine deficit spending as a fashion to save huge protection budgets is a kind of wealth redistribution of the worst variety: thieve from the detrimental to furnish to the rich. there is not any reason behind the U. S. to act as belligerently because it does, basically the very rich interior the U. S. take advantage of protection spending. The detrimental? who do you need to preserve your sleves from yet your man or woman oppressive authorities?

Answer 5

Clinton can't be blamed for the deficit.That's Bush, who's spent like a Democrat for all these years.Clinton's inability to do anything but take it from terrorists for 8 years didn't help,though.That led to the war, that's a big deficit problem.

Answer 6

Definitely blame Bush. Bush is a republican, but he is only conservative when it comes to social issues. He is spending a lot more money than Clinton did. With the Republicans in control of Congress and the White House, they helped large corporations pay less taxes and less fines, so there is less revenue for the government.

The fiscally conservative members of the government are very upset with the way Bush ran the country. Also, the war he started in Iraq (not Afganistan) has cost us a lot of money. We could have spent all that money protecting our ports and borders.

I'm an independent socially liberal, financially conservative voter.

Answer 7

How are you going to blame the Dems when the Repubs have had the power of the senate and the house since 1994? And for the last 6 years have had the white house also? Its funny to see the repubs try to blame everyone else when they are the only ones in charge.

Answer 8

You can blame any deficits created by NAFTA on the Clinton Administration, anything beyond that I'd lay the blame on our Nation's ills scapegoat--GWB JR. Our fearful leader just sent a top notch delegation over to China, let's see what new news they come back with.

Answer 9

Every president since Reagan, including Reagan, should be blamed. Since that is when the President's began proposing massive tax cuts where the majority of people who save money are super rich.

Answer 10

Blame Clinton as he put us into the recession of the late 90s - early 2000s, when the dotcom bubble he allowed to inflate burst, and he didn't impose strong enough trade laws on China.

Those blaming President Bush don't understand the economy or what has happened in the last 12 years.