2006-12-18 06:05:50 · 11 answers · asked by The Who Should I Support Retard 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
At least there is truth in advertising concerning your name
2006-12-18 06:56:00 · answer #1 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Please look for a place called "Palestine" in your atlas, or the World Almanac. You will be surprised to find that there is only one place with that name, and it is in Texas.
Until 1950, the name of the Jerusalem Post was THE PALESTINE POST; the journal of the Zionist Organization of America was NEW PALESTINE; Bank Leumi was the ANGLO-PALESTINE BANK; the Israel Electric Company was the PALESTINE ELECTRIC COMPANY; there was the PALESTINE FOUNDATION FUND and the PALESTINE PHILHARMONIC. All these were Jewish organizations. In America, Zionist youngsters sang "PALESTINE, MY PALESTINE", "PALESTINE SCOUT SONG" and "PALESTINE SPRING SONG." In general, the terms Palestine and Palestinian referred to the region of Palestine as it was. Thus, "Palestinian Jew" and "Palestinian Arab" are straightforward expressions. "Palestine Post" and "Palestine Philharmonic" refer to these bodies as they existed in a place then known as Palestine. The adoption of a Palestinian identity by the Arabs of Palestine is a recent phenomenon. Until the establishment of the State of Israel, and for another decade or so, the term Palestinian applied almost exclusively to the Jews.
2006-12-21 04:15:59 · answer #2 · answered by Mashtin Baqir 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean our "spreading of Democracy" and "inventive interventionism"? it particularly is, traditionally and continuously, worked out "so properly" that the CIA has arise with a seize-word for it: "blow lower back". i won't be able to help yet ponder whether we would not be greater useful with that "spreading democracy" subject if (a) we did no longer do it or (b) if we subsidized reasonable, particularly than extreme (often suitable-wing), regimes. i could choose (a), yet as quickly as we opted for (b)... we'd nonetheless PO human beings, yet possibly no longer as many and not as plenty. of direction, there may be the threat that a real democracy would exercising its unfastened will by using doing something that the U. S. would not like. That purely would not pass over properly in any respect.
2016-10-18 11:01:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who ever runs against whoever reports to be Bush's friend or agrees with his policies
2006-12-18 06:22:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
so u finally agree with 9/11 truther
2006-12-18 06:19:44 · answer #5 · answered by AvO21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paris Hilton. I read something about how she *might* be interested in politics, lol. Seriously, I would take Bush for eternity over her.
2006-12-18 06:12:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should support the democrats. They need more people like you.
2006-12-18 06:26:13 · answer #7 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
BUSH as he has not lied.
2006-12-18 06:16:17 · answer #8 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't care who you support!Stop asking stupid questions.
2006-12-18 06:08:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
THE DEMOCRAPS THAT VOTED TO FOLLOW BLINDLY
2006-12-18 06:08:54 · answer #10 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋