I would in no way say that Hillary or Barack are the "best" candidates the dem's can trot out. There's always Al Gore LOL, or John Kerry, LOL, or John Edwards, LOL. Thats pretty funny.
2006-12-18 06:02:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why is their gender or race a factor? It has absolutely nothing to do with their qualifications. Who cares whether the most qualified candidate is male, female, black, or white? Race, gender, ethnicity should not influence an ethical voter.
2006-12-18 14:01:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Who says they are the best candidates?
Just because the newspaper thinks so....
So much for that liberal, democrat media.
Clinton Obama can't possibly win.
Well.. wait..Who are the republics gonna send up?
Romney / Jeb Bush?
Wait.. maybe they can.
2006-12-18 13:54:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by A N 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good for the Democrats!
2006-12-18 14:58:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Edwards is a good candidate.
I don't think people will put Hillary in the White House again because that would mean Bill would be there.
2006-12-18 13:53:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Wesley Clark sounds good to me, but I don't know if he is going to run yet
2006-12-18 13:52:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm all for a woman candidate...but does it have to be Hillary?
2006-12-18 13:54:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pam 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
What does it matter? Disturbed it isn't another old white guy? Put bleach in your wash next time, your sheet's looking a bit dingy.
2006-12-18 13:59:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
They want to win this time
2006-12-18 14:29:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who says they are the best? They are only the most recognized. (Personally I would vote for Obama in a heart beat)
2006-12-18 13:52:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by LOO S 1
·
4⤊
3⤋