2006-12-18 05:42:13 · 16 answers · asked by Edward 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
sure
2006-12-18 05:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by eonetiller 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is this assuming that we KNEW the circumstances of the future?
I still do not think that I would ever go back and abort.
Knowing how much they have molded history, and the mindsets of others,
and how much they have opened our eyes to the pure hatred and absolutely
repulsive things that could happen to one another, I don't think I would change it.
Why don't we spend less time thinking about what we COULD have done to prevent that, and just accept that as horrible as it is, it IS a part of our history and that if we don't like what happened, we have the power to change it and make our world NOW different?
2006-12-18 05:47:17 · answer #2 · answered by iLoveHugs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because a wrong doesn't make a right, and believe it or not (feel free to call me any name you can think of here) much good, yes good, came from the evil generated by these 2 men, e.g. reviving the U.S. economy from its Depression while uniting its citizens for a good cause to fight and strengthening their collective will, influencing the creation of the U.N. and other unitive political bodies around the world to prevent such evil from happening again, making many people in Allied countries to start praying to God again or even to convert to different religions that suited them better, etc.
I am in no way trying to justify or even rationalize the evil actions of those men, but rather, to prove that good comes from evil, not vice versa as you are suggesting.
2006-12-21 10:19:29 · answer #3 · answered by STILL standing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course, and add many other sick dictators from Mussilini to Pol Pot to Milosovitch, to Saddam Hussien, to Bush, to Blair, Kim Yong Il, to Pinochet, to Mugabe, to Idi Amin, to Tito, to Bin Laden, to Mulla Omar, and many many more.
A dictator is a dictator, elected or otherwise. if a leader ignores the will of the vast majority of their nation, and worse, imposes their will on pain of death over the sovereign citizen's of another nation (eg Iraq) then they are a dictator. Bush and Blair were never elected to rule over Iraqis, they have enacted policies that have seen hundreds of people tortured without any evidence, or charges being placed against them of any crime.
That is a definition of torturing innocent people. If an unelected leader is responsible for the torture and extra-judicial execution of innocent men women and children, and collective punishments that is an evil dictatorship. As Saddam is rightly to be hanged for what he did to the Kurds and others as collective punishments and crimes against humanity, then Bush and Blair likewise should be hanged for their part in the destruction of Fallujah and the collective punishment and executions that took place there.
right wing? left wing? elected or not? it matter not for if they implement evil policies, and subject people to torture and mass killings, then I would abort them!
2006-12-18 06:03:12 · answer #4 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's too late now, it would have too much an effect on today.
I don't think anyone knows what the present would be like/
2006-12-18 05:45:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe the world needed to see the atomic bombs early on. or else they'd have been used en masse later on.
2006-12-18 05:45:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hitler, I'd pull the switch so fast
2006-12-18 05:44:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I would instead encourage their mothers to use birth control. Or abstinence.
2006-12-18 05:43:44 · answer #8 · answered by amylynn25 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They weren't born as demented dictators.
2006-12-18 05:44:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, no, because I wouldn't have had any idea of what they would've done with there lives. They were just normal babies.
2006-12-18 05:44:03 · answer #10 · answered by bosoxdanc 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No Way, Jose!
2006-12-18 05:44:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋