Do you ask and answer questions in a divisive way, or an inclusive way?
2006-12-18 05:15:32 · 14 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That depends. If the question is so blatantly stupid, I'll give them a smart a** answer back because they are the type of person who won't listen or think. If it is a reasonable question, I try to answer based on my beliefs while not belittling another point of view. The best way to look at anything is from all angles.
2006-12-18 05:19:44 · answer #1 · answered by matt b 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Depending 1-on the question 2- the way it is asked 3- how the words are spelt 4- my mood of the moment. When I feel a real question from someone genuinely interested in a subject I go to great lenght to answer the question if I have some expertise or knowledge. In other cases I just slam the door on the nose of the arrogant or stupid jerk.
2006-12-18 13:19:47 · answer #2 · answered by Mimi 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Human nature requires both. After 9/11 we were united, on political issues we are divided. here is an example," I try to be a uniter but the opposite opinion calls me a divider, and the other way around."
2006-12-18 13:24:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I call 'em as I see 'em!
I try to answer in such a way that people on the "other side" can understand my reasoning, even if they don't agree with it.
And I don't feel I am defending "my team" - I am a citizen and I will criticize anyone, although obsiously I have my biases.
No use getting nasty, although I do get "passsionate" from time to time.
:)
2006-12-18 15:01:48 · answer #4 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This depends entirely on the question. Usually, I just try to answer it.
As far as asking goes, I stopped doing much of that after getting questions deleted for "chatting!"
But to answer your question, I try to evoke a sense of strong Americanism. A lot of Americans are having trouble with this right now, so some might see me as divisive.
2006-12-18 13:19:25 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I tend to follow Socrates when asking non technical questions to get people to think. You would term this a divider.
This is less and less popular in today's world where most people want to act as though they are free thinkers but usually follow along with the crowd. It's just a sign of the times.
The other type "uniter" leads to a hazardous situation called "group think".
2006-12-18 13:22:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well, I think it would depend on the topic. For some things I would be a uniter, for example, when dealing with a common enemy. But other things, like issues concering personal well-being, I think it's important for people to decide on that themselves.
2006-12-18 13:23:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
uniter
2006-12-18 13:21:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have my beliefs when it comes to religion, politics, etc., but when I ask questions -- particularly on Y:A -- then I try to ask them in the most objective way possible. I like to read the opinions of others, even if I don't agree with them.
2006-12-18 13:20:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sometimes I am and sometimes I'm not .
Sometimes I do and sometimes I don't .
Depends on how I feel about the question . OK !!
2006-12-18 13:20:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋