English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Read the answers to this question and notice how the primary response was "Bush isn't qualified so Democrats don't have to be either."

Does anyone else see a logical fallacy in this arguement?

Never mind that the original question had absolutely nothing to do with Bush.

2006-12-18 04:49:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsQt83k7UDMqrZSbDt2ae1jzy6IX?qid=20061218092150AAuYHef

2006-12-18 04:58:44 · update #1

5 answers

You are incorrect that the question has nothing to do with Bush. While the "Narrow Minded Group" is the subject of your question, it is about how they feel about him. But I'm not quite sure what your question means. It really doesn't make any sense.

****************

Thanks for providing the link. I thought you were referring to your own original question. Being middle of the road myself, I see things pretty unbiased, hopefully. If a politician isn't qualified or is qualified it doesn't matter to me what their political affiliation is, I either choose them or don't choose them. People answer questions like that when they don't have an answer. I see people from all walks of life answer questions like that, not just liberals.

2006-12-18 04:54:38 · answer #1 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 1 0

That group of pinheads has been out of control since they were in diapers and their parents refused to enforce basic brat discipline. They got used to running the asylum and expect that everyone that doesn't agree with them must be shouted down.

The fact that these characters are usually broke, often unemployed, have relationships in tatters, and regularly consider suicide doesn't seem to have caused them to wake up and smell the coffee, has it?

2006-12-18 12:54:25 · answer #2 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 0 1

you didn't put up the link (when I was here anyway) but I'm assuming it's to the bottles question about Nanci Pelosi? if so he makes one sided remarks that aren't meant for debate.. they are propaganda.. and you respond to propaganda in kind (such as fighting fire with fire) .. if a real question were asked it would get a real answer.

2006-12-18 12:54:40 · answer #3 · answered by pip 7 · 0 0

Yes. 6 years ago. Their hatred of Bush has long been pathological.

2006-12-18 12:52:39 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 2

hey

you are confusing a lot of people on here so stop it

jk

some of us understand, and the ones that usually understand (like myself) have given up persuading people and have stepped to just jokes

2006-12-18 12:55:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers