2006-12-18 04:29:57 · 24 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm not a liberal
2006-12-18 04:59:28 · update #1
Appropriate counter to previously asked question re: Pelosi. While I appreciate (and empathize) with the sentiment, I'm hoping that the discourse between the two main Parties (as well as all the independents) will be elevated beyond what we've seen in the last 6 years. The vitriole has not gained much for us as a nation, and we need to find a way to reclaim our standing in the world as a thoughtful, intelligent and compassionate culture with a long-term view.
2006-12-18 05:18:19 · answer #1 · answered by Finnegan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He was elected. He meets all the requirements enumerated in the Constitution. That would make him "qualified" in the strictest sense. I never said he was a good president. Even qualified people can do a bad job. Too bad America's voter turnout is so low...maybe it would have been different if more people got out and cast ballots...
And I'm not a Republican.
2006-12-18 04:47:44 · answer #2 · answered by wrathinif 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Dow averages are frequently meaningless because the standards in time at which they were chosen are extremely arbitrary. Clinton presided for the period of a time for the period of large economic boom, to which he had somewhat to do with yet not a lot. of course that boom fee isn't a chance to maintain and may't extremely be used as a level to guage following administration. pastime introduction also should be represented as % develop of jobs extremely than gross develop in jobs bc of inhabitants replace, although they'd nicely be minuscule in adjoining words.. with the help of ways i accept as true with you, sorry if it appeared like i replaced into ripping your concept/findings. I basically stumbled on some topics IMO.
2016-11-30 22:17:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe I am pretty honest. I usually give you liberals the benefit of the doubt; at least, the ones who aren't complete idiots. I think most liberals have really good ideas, but sometimes they are not entirely realistic. I have stated numerous times on here that the ONLY way to continue this country is to combine wits and quit the two-party head butting. Sure, I joke around sometimes to get you guys riled up, but I am far from the most conservative Republican.
So, IF I qualify for an honest Republican, I think he has done an OK job.
1. He did not lie to get in Iraq. He got incorrect information that there were WMD's in Iraq. Someone should have been fired for this wrong info, but George W. did not just "make this up"
2. Somehow, we HAVE kept terrorists out of America for the last five years. Like it or not, he did something right, and we are safer because of it.
3. He IS a moral guy and, religion aside, we SHOULD keep this as a moral country. We should not even begin to enforce any beliefs on anyone, but if this country ever loses its morals, we are done for.
However, our borders are not secured, and Iraq isn't much better now than when we started the war. But he is qualified for the job, and has done better than any of us, chatting on the internet all day, could have.
2006-12-18 04:31:13 · answer #4 · answered by i hate hippies but love my Jesus 4 · 11⤊ 5⤋
Its hard to tell. He hasn't been the best president ever, and he has done a bad job at making everyone happy. Even with that being said, I still think he is at least qualified for the job. He is, after all, better than the other candidates that he ran against.
2006-12-18 04:32:38 · answer #5 · answered by Titainsrule 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Can an honest Demoncrap accept the fact that a legally elected president deserves respect. that the President was elected by the people and you need to grow up and quit crying over lost elections Qualified or not He is the President and crying and whining won't change anything. Keep the Kerry bumper sticker it makes you losers easier to spot
2006-12-18 04:37:10 · answer #6 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ok, what is your assessment as to why he is not qualified? You must be a liberal so I would ask you the same question about the new DNC wonder child Barack Obama? Why would he suddenly be qualified and Bush isn't? At least Bush was Governor of a large state first. Obama has never led anything.
2006-12-18 04:32:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
In all honesty, President Bush IS qualified for the job!
2006-12-18 04:35:11 · answer #8 · answered by Katz 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Okay to be honest...NO ONE IS....we are in a fundamental change in the U.S. that the next decade will show major changes in the social and economic landscape. Not one candidate on the political arena have come to terms to the fact that their way is not necessarily the right way.
2006-12-18 04:35:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
There is no reason that a REAL Republican would quarrel with the fact that Bush is totally unqualified. Bush is NOT a Republican. Anyone who claims to be a republican and defends Bush as a republican is dishonest. Bush is a fascist, and given the chance would be a complete dictator.
2006-12-18 04:34:12 · answer #10 · answered by stumblebum 1 · 2⤊ 7⤋