English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-18 03:55:25 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Psychology

6 answers

Bishop Jakes puts it best..."Faithful are the wounds of a friend"

When you unconditionally love and support someone, when you have to tell them something for their own good, it may sting a little bit, but if they really know you love them, they will understand.

2006-12-18 04:54:34 · answer #1 · answered by â¤??? ?å???? 4 · 0 0

Unconditional is consistent and unwavering. You can be there for someone through thick and thin. You don't have to agree with what they have done and you can let them know that but as long as you are always willing to be there for them you are being supportive. I would use positive reinforcement.

2006-12-18 12:01:18 · answer #2 · answered by Mimi 6 · 0 0

That's a contradiction in terms...

If you have to be assertive and firm...you are not supporting him in what he wants to do...but preventing him to do it.

You can only give your support when he start doing what you want him to do.

2006-12-18 12:02:01 · answer #3 · answered by Aussies-Online 5 · 0 0

unconditional

2006-12-18 12:03:25 · answer #4 · answered by middle way 2 · 1 0

Just let your "yes" always mean yes, and your "no" always mean no. Then, they understand that you are basing your judgment off of your morals, not them.

2006-12-18 12:04:42 · answer #5 · answered by dearreal 3 · 0 0

Hoest but not brutal.

2006-12-18 12:09:39 · answer #6 · answered by robert m 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers