What is your opinion about what triggered the Big Bang?

Answer 1

"Trigger" implies a process that occurs in time, a temporal action. However, before the Big Bang, there was no time; time and space are consequences of the Big Bang. Thus, it makes no sense to speak of antecedent temporal causality, since time did not exist. This is one of the extremely difficult and counterintuitive elements of the Big Bang, and very few people can get their heads around it (Stephen Hawking).

Humans, being biolgical creatures have their entire existence at its most basic level, including all biochemical reactions, all electrical actions of neurobiology, kinesology, psychology, much of our abstract thinking, so thoroughly and inextractibly shot through with the idea of time, that general relativity and the Big Bang are conceptually all but impossible outside of mathematics.

Answer 2

The truth is that no one knows for sure.

It seems the more I know about the suibject the less I am willing to even guess.

I suppose that the universe is in a perpetual state of contraction and expansion that has been going on forever. "forever" is a concept that I have a hard time with. in our world everything has a beginning and also an end. It's hard to fathom something that simply exists and has always existed and will continue to exist.
Although this theory has an appeal to me as most things in life that we experience have a cycylical nature to them. The seasons, the day and night, even our very lives. All occur in cycles. The idea that the universe might be destroyed and reborn every 100 billion years or so is something that I can relate to. Forever expanding until the engery becomes so dispersed that the rate of expansioon slows enough so that gravity can begin to pull everything back together again.. eventually into a tiny area of near infinite density only to explode forth once again.

Answer 3

I don't think it was a big bang so much as a 'Big Bounce' the universe before us, after reaching its critical radius, contracted into a singularity and instantly bounced outward. But this theory assumes that this universe consists of all matter in existence - maybe the big bang was the creation of a black hole in another universe and we are what spewed out of it (not likely).

Or maybe the geometry of our universe (including the dimension of time) are in such a form that when the universe expands to a certain point, it reappears as a singularity.

These theories give a sort of frequency to the universe - and its possible that the matter which you consist of was in exactly the same place today minus one universal period and you've asked this question already. (Certainly gives you another look at the meaning of deja vu)

Answer 4

There are 4 radicals in the gravity systems. One is a
uncontrolled data level similar though not the same as television. If 20 planets rotate softly around a major solar system and do not emit radons at all, the system rises as a comet funnel solar system. This displacement of about 20 distances of a
gravity belt sets the energy in the data world into an exploding
star. The big bang, quasars, radio, or geodyne stars can do this and then slowly cool into new system. This absorbed energy has units of data that are positive life creative. The data
for this choice of this system is because we show larger levels of uranium than older and younger systems.

Answer 5

Negative vacuum pressure on a multi-dimensional torus left over from the collision of three hyper dimensional membranes causing the symmetry to break resulting in the rapid inflation of the three directional dimensions, the stretching of several relative attracting dimensions forming gravity and inclusion of many sub plank dimensions forming the other forces, elementary particles, dark matter, and dark energy. 373,248 dimensions in all. Very simple.

Answer 6

I don't know that much about astronomy and astro-physics, but I would guess, that after all those years of compacting matter, that the whole process became unstable for whatever reason. It could have been the pressure, or it could have been the temperature.
There may be a "critical" density that we don't know about, and if you try to increase beyond that, then the process is reversed automatically with (obviously) catastrophic results.

Answer 7

Well, I think it is the "M" Theory...Multi Universes. It would explain a lot..First it would bring a 13th dimension to the table also Parallel universes...

Which is what I think caused the BIG BANG.

One Universe collided with another Universe, which caused the a major explosion and would provide enough heat to develop the gases into Stars..

Answer 8

This is perhaps "the" question of all time. Odds are, it is something that is not knowable, seeing as how it requires information about something that is likely outside of our universe. It brings up questions such as:

Where did our universe come from?
If our universe is inflating, what is it inflating into?
Are there other universes just like this one?

Maybe the best answer is that it is just an attribute of "space" that allows universes to be created.

Answer 9

Hi. Assuming a dimensionless singularity really did exist, then as a point entity it would be subject to quantum laws (if they exist in that environment) and could spontaneously jump from a stable state to an unstable one. Just a thought.

Answer 10

It had to be an act of nothing. At zero time nothing existed,we are probably speculating on the unknowable!