That was so FUNNY when they couldn't start the fire. I was laughing my *** off. And then they started showing members of the jury yawning and getting mad. It was hilarious yet sad in a way. You would think after 39 days, right. 2 people are better though in the final.
2006-12-18 02:52:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Noclue 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
2. Becky was a wasted space. By her not even knowing how to start fire after 39 days shows she was riding ozzy and yul the entire time. I was not impressed with the final outcome because it was too "nice". No cut throat at the end....zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
2006-12-18 02:39:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by jshorePR 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah, I don't know why they had 3 in the finals. Becky, nor Sundra deserved to be there. That's why they didn't get any votes. I think Survivor should stop trying to make these surprise twists and stick to what works.
2006-12-18 08:33:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by smm_8514 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
It all depends on who the final 3 is. I heard Micronesia was supposed to be a final 3 tribal council, so if that would've happened, the. Cities would've probably won instead of Parvati.
2015-01-26 13:18:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Christina 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I totally agree with you. I think its better with 2. Becky did NOT deserve to be up there.
2006-12-18 04:12:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Spoiled 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think 2. Becky had no business being up there with those two dynamite players.
2006-12-18 02:49:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
having 3 was pretty cool..
poor becky was left out though lol.
i was hoping sundra would have made it to final 3. she was my favorite :)
2006-12-18 02:38:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by girl 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Survivior is just a load of bull...
2006-12-18 02:32:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by silvs 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
TWO
2006-12-18 02:59:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wade S 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Reality" Television sucks...
2006-12-18 02:32:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Desiree D 2
·
0⤊
4⤋