English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is now evident that after Jessica lal case judgement, Ram Jethmalani appeared for accused only for money, even the world know what happened in that case. But he was once in cabinet minister for law. Did he do anything for indian judiciary and people. Has he any moral face? Even the accused was convicted, he will be laughing all the way to the bank.

2006-12-18 02:24:41 · 6 answers · asked by ~~Y~~ 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

6 answers

As an advocate he was doing his legal duty so you cannot blame him. As an officer of the court he is supposed to guide the court to come to decision keeping in view the intrest of his client, if he did this then nothing wrong. You cannot blame him for morallity only because he defended the accused person, but you could blame him on ground of morallity if he did not defend his client properly.

2006-12-18 20:36:53 · answer #1 · answered by bisexualmale s 6 · 0 0

jessica lal case is yet to be solved as Indian judiciary is reportedly famous for taking the cases to the lifetime of the accused. The hurdles of Supreme Court and Clemency Petition are yet to be resloved.Justice delayed is justice denied.

2006-12-18 10:49:41 · answer #2 · answered by never_exist 1 · 0 0

He was just trying to fine tune his argumentative powers in the old age to rebuild his market value. By the way, who told you that former or for that matter minister occupying ministerial berths are bound to have morality or an upright conscience.

2006-12-18 13:12:04 · answer #3 · answered by Titu66 2 · 0 0

Yes , by sending manu sharma behind the bars,he certainely did achieved his goal, this is his second defeat in recnt , the previous one was shankracharya

2006-12-19 11:53:22 · answer #4 · answered by mukul (still busy on a project) 4 · 0 0

He is no lesser crook than others and was elevated to this level by other crooks. Our system is designed to protect and promote such guys.

2006-12-18 14:15:29 · answer #5 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 0 0

no

2006-12-18 12:45:34 · answer #6 · answered by udayashanker k 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers