let's say those are your only two choices. they both have varying agendas and have something against them; they aren't white, christian males. i wonder if our society would rally to pick the 'lesser' of two evils with total disregard to their political stances.
2006-12-18 01:36:31 · 12 answers · asked by Kismet 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Obama..... then I'd start shooting heroin-- hourly
2006-12-18 01:39:36 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Neither is qualified, but voting for the 'lesser of two evils' is equally bad. It would be far better, in that situation, to not vote at all instead of electing an unqualified politician because 'there weren't any other choices'!
2006-12-18 09:45:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for both on the same ticket! Hillary as president and Obama as vice president. The American people are tired of Republicans. Just open the newspaper, turn on the T.V. or just take a drive and you'll soon see how they have really screwed up this country.
2006-12-18 10:20:52 · answer #3 · answered by Dan 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If those were my ONLY two choices I wouldn't vote. I would also seriously consider leaving the country for being so absolutely foolish enough to place either of these individuals on the Presidential ballot. And it's not because of their race or gender, I would vote for Condoleezza Rice or J.C. Watts, the Republican Congressman from Oklahoma, it's their core beliefs, nothing more.
Tax the poor !!!
2006-12-18 09:47:26 · answer #4 · answered by Scorpius 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think we need on our political ballots THE NONE OF THE ABOVE CANDIDATE category, but I think the politicians are afraid of that ballot because in this case this would be a classic example where this might be the first choice.
2006-12-18 11:10:27 · answer #5 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They will both be on the Dem ticket so they want run against each other in the presidential race. If they were both on the ballet I would use a write in for Colin Powell.
2006-12-18 09:41:55 · answer #6 · answered by joevette 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Rudy Giuliani and/or John McCain as a Republican.
Hillary is a crook (who avoided charges of fraudulent land deals in Arkansas, by other people going to jail to protect her) and because she is a power monger that promotes socialism and wealth redistribution. And of course Obama has no experience.
2006-12-18 09:52:20 · answer #7 · answered by redjetta 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What is wrong with "white christian males?"
Anyway, Obama has a better head on his shoulders and isn't allied with a sullied name that was involved in scandal and illegality.
2006-12-18 17:21:30 · answer #8 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clinton
2006-12-18 09:38:25 · answer #9 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
"Osama"!
the lesser of the evils!
2006-12-18 10:12:32 · answer #10 · answered by ♥honey♥ 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋