2006-12-18 00:23:07 · 8 answers · asked by Bryan 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I believe that the Bush legacy will become clear in the next two years. What the Dems do and don't do will finally be out front. Since nobody who would be running is currently apart of the Bush team/legacy it will be wide open and a clear evaluation of his accomplishments in office will come down the road.
2006-12-18 01:00:18 · answer #1 · answered by Faith White 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I also agree that the next two years are crucial. If we can stabilize Baghdad, and train enough Iraqi military and police to take over, I believe the American people will want a strong President to continue the fight against any extremists wanting to do harm to America.
If the situation does not improve, I believe the people who think we can "talk" and "negotiate" with countries who are aiding and abetting terrorists, will elect an appeaser.
President Bush's legacy will not be known for many years, and I'm sure the knowledgeable, as well as those whose only info comes from the main stream media will continue the vitriolic debate.
2006-12-18 07:26:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anji 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My wager is that maximum could write in the candidate of their determination because of the fact neither a variety of symbolize know for the U. S. and its shape. A cursory look does tutor thrilling similarities: a million. faith is the guideline of the day ---- Bush is prompted by the nicely suited wing non secular coalitions and a conviction that God speaks by him ---- Ahmadinejad reverses judgements greater permissive in the direction of females if the clerics disagree 2. inspite of reasoned arguments to the alternative, they the two undermine beginning administration. ---- Bush with 'abstinence only' courses right here and in another country that don't artwork ---- Ahmadinejad urging couples to have greater babies inspite of surging inflation and extending unemployment 3. the two hear to their grasp's voice ---- Bush has Cheney who won't obey adjust to government orders and pressures him to behave against Iran ---- Ahmadinejad could disagree, yet Ayatollah Khamenei continues to be the ideally suited chief 4. the two criticize one yet another, and desire kin with Russia 5. the two are a becoming type of unpopular with their components ---- Bush for concentration on conflict and pushing aside important better half and youngsters topics, spiraling debt for one. ---- Ahmadinejad for concentration on US grievance and pushing aside important better half and youngsters topics, monetary equipment for one that is adequate, isn't it?
2016-12-18 15:18:07 · answer #3 · answered by edme 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like to look at patterns going back in history the pendulum seems to swing back and forth in a pretty regular way Johnson/wimp to Nixon/tough guy, to Carter/wimp to Reagan,Bush/tough guy, to Clinton/wimp to Bush/tough guy it looks like there is a possibility we are due for a wimp again.
2006-12-18 02:17:29 · answer #4 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope he has a plan to pay all the bills.Our debt is the largest ever and there is no other option but to raise taxes....Hello another recession.
2006-12-18 03:55:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has fu**ed up our image as Americans. I hope the next president can get us on track again with fewer conflicts and a booming economy...and quickly.
2006-12-18 00:27:28 · answer #6 · answered by deuce_poppi954 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It will ensure a John McCains succession to him. Moderate yet he will sweep the evangelical vote.
2006-12-18 00:45:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
they don't just want "cake" ; anymore?
2006-12-18 00:26:56 · answer #8 · answered by dorianalways 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋