This poser keeps saying he's both. I don't think thats possible.
2006-12-18 00:00:54 · 9 answers · asked by Jamie.Paranormal 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Anarchy means an absence of government! I don't see how you can support both.
2006-12-18 00:05:20 · answer #1 · answered by jack w 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even if he's extremely Liberal, as in borderline Socialist, he couldn't be anarchist. A Socialist mentality would be that of government in control of everything, that is almost the complete opposite of Anarchists.
2006-12-18 08:19:25 · answer #2 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The ultimate liberal is an anarchist. A true liberal would believe in personal liberty without government interference. The lack of a government (anarchy) would mean no government interference and unrestricted personal liberty.
2006-12-18 08:25:14 · answer #3 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
impossible, anarchists believe in self rule without a common leadership. Their society is governed by self imposed morality. A liberal with morals?
2006-12-18 08:30:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jedi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. An anarchist believe in no laws. liberals do believe in laws. In fact we support a great deal of them contrary to some peoples opinions. also, i dont think they believe in any govt. at all.
2006-12-18 08:14:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure, that isn't much more of a reach than Bush saying that he is Christian[sic] and the "war pesident".
2006-12-18 08:37:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
They look about the same from here.
2006-12-18 08:06:52 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
gonorrhea and syphilis, at the same time? Sure.
(just kidding)
2006-12-18 08:05:27 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
sure
2006-12-18 08:02:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋