Why do the C.R.A.P. still yammer on about Clinton. .?

Question

He gave shitbag bush a surplus he squandered that and now we have a humungous deficit. What a great shitbag president he is.

He sent soldiers off to fight , not for our freedom , but for his own personal agenda and managed to destroy a country that had nothing to do wqith 9/11 in the process. what a great president.

Clinton lied about Lewinski: noone died. two people came.
bush lied about wmd: almost 4000 us troops and over 600,000 innocent Iraqi civillians died.
Clinton gave China secrets
bush gave an innocent country death, gave a powerful nation an unstable economy, gave a powerful nation a gigantic debt and gave us also a never ending war for our grand childrens grandchildren to enjoy.

bush let the the binladen family go.... his ticket to capturing Osama.
bush has dinner with the Saudis, the supposed perpetrators of 9/11

Clinton was a 1000 times the president shitbag bush is

not to mention we killed all them innocents with 1000 lbs bombs, cluster bombs and depleted uranium.
now we want to make torture legal.
The C.R.A.P. is such a good model of leadership.

"Mission Accomplished" was such a gross overstatement its embrassing to say what country you belong to

Answer 1

A surplus? Yes if you consider giving Social security an IOU to the tune of 92 billion a surplus! The year that Clinton had a 32 billion dollar surplus, he actually had a 60 billion dollar defecit, until he took the money from SS and added it to the general fund!

Answer 2

Let's try to get back in the realm of honest debate shall we?
Clinton did balance the budget. He did this by dessimating both militray and intelligence budgets and made us less safe and prepared in return. Clinton did not reduce the deficit at all during his term. If you want to argue it didn't grow fine, but there was no reduction period.
The justice department under Clinton made it impossible for intelligence agencies to share information thereby making us less safe again.
If George Bush lied about WMDs it was related to intellignece failures. There is no doubt that Hussein had WMDs, he used them both in the Iranian war and against his own people following the first Gulf War. Further if Bush lied then so did Clinton, the UN and almost every member of congress. Why is it that people like yourself cannot consider the full context and reason for why we went to war?, but rather choose to cite only the causes which you feel support your radical position? That in and of itself is a deception by ommission.
Mr. Bush did not make the decision about Saudis being allowed to leave the country. Further there is no evidence presented to indict the Saudi government for the actions of the 911 hijackers. Yes several were from that country, but that does not make the government culpable for their actions. That would be like saying our government is responsible for the actions of every criminal in the United States.
The number you cite for deaths is unsubstantiated. Iraq was not innocent they were in violation of numerous UN resolutions and the ceasefire which ended the first gulf war.
As to capturing Bin Laden, Clinton was closer than Bush ever was. He was offered the man on a silver platter by Sudan and refused.
Your contentions on the economy are just completely misinformed. Yes the deficit is high. However, the GDP and Stock Market are up. Taxes and Unemployment are down. In case you cannot understand this, these are all signs of a strong economy.
People do not care that Clinton had sex with anyone. What people care about is that Clinton lied under oath before a grand jury. This is not only a crime, but also a huge credibility issue. Democrats state that this is a minor thing, the problem is that if he lied over something so minor, what did he lie about that wasn't minor? Then these same people scream about Bush being a liar. A lie is a lie period, you either hold all to a standard, or you hold none to it.

In short your post is uninformed, dishonest drivel. If you want to debate issues post honestly, otherwise be relegated to the position of a malcontent bomb thrower.

dadacoolone: America was not loved under Clinton. We have been the world's chosen punching dummy since the fall of the Soviet Union. This is the curse of being the world's lone Superpower. We get all of the blame and very little of the credit. You want to indict the right fine. My question is why is the left so willing to ignore history when it does support their position?

Answer 3

I don't know about yammering but Clinton was a joke as far as the presidency was concerned and your arguements are ludicris at best.

He gave Bush a surplus - Yeah, a bogus surplus created by raping the Social Security Trust Fund so there won't be a dime for you when you retire.

Clinton lied and no one died? - How about all the American Military deaths nd the first attack on WTC that Clinton ignored because he was too busy defending his diddle sessions with fat Monica?

That 600,000 figure is bullcrap.

Innocent country death - What innocent country is that, pray tell?

The Country is in great economic shape despite Clinton's shennanigans.

Let the Bin Laden Family go - I see, you want to hold them responsible for Osama even though they had nothing to do with his actions and publically denounced him. Yeah, in your little pea brain that would be fair.

making the Saudi Royal Family responsible for the actions of some of their citizens would equate to holding YOU responsible for the actions of Timothy McVeah.

Clinton was the bag you describe, and being that you admire him so much, you must be a paart of it.

Answer 4

This is the last time I will answer any of your questions because they are ridiculous and full of lies. Your facts and numbers are wrong, I'm guessing intentionally and you give opinion as if it were fact. This is a common trend I see amongst Democrats. I am going to separate your facts from opinions and dispute both.

Bush did not lie for the reasons to go to war. I am not saying he never has lied, every politician has lied. But he used the best pieces of intelligence available from the multiple U.S. agencies as well as those from European countries including England, France, and Germany. It was the problem with the communication between the different intelligence communities that created the discrepancies. How can it be a lie if what President Bush was saying is well documented by all the intelligence communities involved, and the parts that were discovered to be false were done so after the war had began and we had an opportunity to go in and see for ourselves. Having the wrong facts and believing them (Not just Bush or Rep., but Dem., and many other countries) is not lying. Clinton lied to Congress and the country UNDER OATH. It was not the content of the lie that mattered, but when and to whom.

You say 600,000 Iraqi civilians have died. Where do you get your facts? I saw a study one month ago that said the number was 100,000 people most as a result of medical reasons and Iraqi insurgents, not U.S. troops. This study was even refuted by many analysts as being far too high. Some Conservative figures show the total amount at 30,000, again mostly as a result of other Iraqis. Maybe your figure is the number of Iraqi civilians that died under Sadam's rule during the 12 years between Iraq war 1 and Iraq war 2. And of course you have to inflate the U.S. soldier number, it just hit 3,000 not 4,000, and that figure is listed and accepted by all credible sources.

As far as Iraq being a nation with a stable economy and little debt before the war it was anything but. I do not know how you came to that conclusion. It still owed France and Russia Billions from the Iraq-Iran war of the '80's along with the debt incurred from Iraq 1 along with the U.N. sanctions that followed. It was considered a third world country by most political scientists and world standards. Read any book on world governments or world economies and you will see that is the truth.

It is your opinion that this war will last until the birth of my great-grandchildren. Mine is, that is ridiculous. No war in modern times has lasted even close to that long. That is unless you want to include some ongoing civil wars. Even those have not been continuous for periods of upwards of fifty years. There are times when there are no real battles for years at a time during such wars.

The Bin laden family is a wealthy well respected family both here and worldwide. They own and operate many businesses around the world, and have no known link to terrorism. They had cut off ties with Osama twenty years before 911. You said we should have basically imprisioned them after 911. That is like saying that you have a brother who turned out to be a serial killer. It is 99.99 % that he was the person responsible for killing 50 people and was on the run. You and him had a falling out twenty years before than and have had no contact. With your reasoning the cops should come to your house and arrest you for being related to him because you have to be guilty too because you are related.

If you want people to respect your opinions talk like a grown up, use the correct information, and do not give opinions and try to pass it off as fact. Don’t act like you are educated about a subject that you clearly are not.

Answer 5

Its unfortunate that the right does not accept that no one says Clinton was perfect but when you compare him to Bush he was an angel... The fact is the world loved America when Clinton was president but under Bush we have become the most hated nation in the world..!

Answer 6

Because their brain dead sheep.LOL