Would it be correct to say that absence of energy there is no way to confirm the existent of "mass"?
2006-12-17 20:32:49 · 5 answers · asked by Programmer 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
energy is every where ,so ,it will be incorrect to say so
2006-12-17 20:42:35 · answer #1 · answered by Byzantino 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
if there is no mass then there is no atomic substance which would absorb and use the energy, therefore the absence of matter will result and mean the absence of energy. But it cannot be said of the opposite, absence of energy is not necessarily the absence of mass. And einstein theory has nothing to do with it. If acceleration of a object is 0 then using newton's equation F=ma is m(0)=F=0 does that mean there is no mass due to acceleration, that's obviously not true. The object or mattter will remain stationary until it receives the energy, it will wait until energy comes near it and is absorbed, after which it will commit movement. Energy is merely for movement and work, without it the object will remain stationary but it is not non-existent due to a net 0 of energy.
2006-12-17 21:27:57 · answer #2 · answered by Zidane 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This is in statement true owing to the relation e=mc^2 but a situation where energy is absent can probably be found only in a textbook scenario.
2006-12-17 21:20:41 · answer #3 · answered by yasiru89 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You appear to be asking if all methods for checking for mass involve work? (energy) True
2006-12-17 22:21:09 · answer #4 · answered by slatibartfast 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The theory of Einstein states that mass is energy since its formula
E = m c^2
So, if you have mass, you have energy with this formula
2006-12-17 21:18:12 · answer #5 · answered by maussy 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋