which attack would you have a better chance of surviving, attacked by pack of dogs or 3 very angry women?

Answer 1

Dogs, they would probably stop after you fell to the ground.

Answer 2

That is a stupid question but I will try to give a rational answer. In general you would have a better chance of surviving an attack by 3 very angry women because women are not by nature violent and they certainly don't harbor murder in their hearts.

Dogs don't harbor murder either but they do have a "pack" mentality and once the "frenzy" starts there is no going back until they become bored or they are run off.

An mature adult would have a better chance of surviving an attack by pack of dogs than a child or an frail elderly person would.

Answer 3

Interesting question.

Depends on the dogs and on the women, frankly. A pack of chiuauas are certainly less dangerous than a pack of pit bulls, and women with guns are more dangerous than women without guns.

For the sake of discussion I'm going to assume the dogs are about the size of pit bulls and the woman have no weapons other than their bodies. Additionally, your question assumes both are willing to attack, which might not be a valid assumption in either case. With these caveats aside, here's my answer.

Given those parameters, I'd say you have a better chance of surviving an attack of women than dogs. Dogs are naturally pack animals. They hunt together, bring down prey together, and kill it together. They work in concert. Dogs use their teeth to rip and tear, and also to drag. They cooperate and they are patient. If a pack of dogs attacks it's likely they'll go for the kill unless driven off.

Women who are very angry might still not be willing to be so violent that they are willing to kill, however. And the damage they inflict will be fists and nails and kicking, which are generally superficial injuries.

Answer 4

There's sort of no good answer for this. It depends upon the attacker. Some attackers do get scared off by a woman who fights back; some get angry about it. If there's a weapon involved, well, then I would think your chances would be better if you co-operate. You'd sort of have to make some quick judgment calls from how he was acting. I do remember years ago hearing a story about a woman who got down into the grass and started eating it like a cow. It so freaked out the guy, that he split. I'm not saying that'd work on everyone, but if you act crazier than he is, it could save you. However, the one thing you NEVER co-operate on is to let him take you anywhere else whether that is to another room or in his car to some remote area. Learn from Oprah and the experts who do her shows. A second location means something bad is going to happen to you - often death. Oh, one more thing I remember hearing. Yell, "Fire." Sadly, more people will come to your rescue if they hear "fire" being yelled than "rape."

Answer 5

Dogs, because angry women will attack you and your friends and family and all your future prospects

Answer 6

Neither. I think you're done for in both, but I'd choose the dogs, because at least death will come swiftly, but with the women it would be slow and agonising........

Answer 7

Dogs, Women are vicious!

Answer 8

dogs...there is a posture you can assume during an attack that makes dogs stop.

Answer 9

Dogs are deadly animals.

Answer 10

the 3 dogs...at leat they will eventually kill you...the women will ***** and nag and you will wish you were dead ....