Shaquille O'Neal. I'm a firm believer that Allen Iverson will never win a championship for the following reasons.
1. He is an awful shooter. Just because you average 31.2 points a game does not make you an excellent shooter. He shoots a lousy .421 percent.
2. He doesn't attend practice. This shows that he has no commitment to his teams mates, coaches, or the franchise.
3. He portrays the image of a criminal.
4. He complains that he doesn't have a good enough set of teammates around him. Kobe Bryant made it to the playoffs last year with a far worse starting five than Philadelphia.
I could continue on, but I rather not. The hype on Allen Iverson nauseates me.
2006-12-17 17:57:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by designkidcom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This commerce reward both communities nicely. The Pistons have higher offensive firepower with Iverson that's elementary. Iverson positioned up 27ppg and seven assists in line with recreation very last 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, larger apg than Chauncey. The pressure that Iverson places on a protection opens it up for anybody else. The Pistons have large intensity and Stuckey is able to come back in and fill Chauncey's shoes to a particular quantity. Neither Stuckey or Iverson are truly the authentic factor guards that Chauncey is that's the basically element that ought to doubtlessly damage the Pistons. i imagine that dropping McDyess hurts the Pistons worse than Chauncey. MyDyess presented veteran administration to the Pistons youthful bench of Maxiel and Johnson who nonetheless have not truly shown themselves. McDyess is almost a gaurantee at 15 ft, can rebound, and performs good D. more beneficial than some thing, he has heart. If Iverson clicks with the Pistons although, the offense will be extremely powerful. Denver on the different hand receives a magnificent factor gaurd to serve up a powerful offense. If Chauncey and McDyess play the protection that they have got shown they are able to in Detroit than Denver would have a minimum of two gamers who play protection. I dont keep in mind that Chauncey and Dyess in fantastic condition into the Nuggets offense that averaged 110ppg very last season and allow the fighters positioned up 107. I nonetheless imagine they get more beneficial although because the blended skills of Billups and McDyess outweigh Iverson.
2016-11-30 22:00:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shaq but I have to say it was a good choice for the lakers to trade him because he is older and on his last legs especially when Yao Ming killed him this year. The Lakers getting LO was great because he can fill up the stat sheet like a dude that use to play in chicago name Pippen not to mention LO was tutored last year by Pippen and this year before his knee sprain LO was playing like Pippen. But the Iverson trade will be big I think he is going to go to the Clippers though.
2006-12-17 20:44:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by southernbound 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
iverson i think cause hes the only player holding the sixers together. if he gets traded all his millions of fans get traded as well and for all you know the sixers will be the worst basketball team. they are already pretty bad seeing this years season.
2006-12-17 19:58:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by johnny r 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh hmmm uhhhhh iverson hes huge shaq has bad knees iverson is great am a laker fan and the heat gave lamer i love him his great
2006-12-17 17:42:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by hovercorp 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shaq because without him the Heat wouldn't have won a championship, as you can see heat isn't doing good without him.
2006-12-17 17:46:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by B@LL3r wif FLow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iverson.
Shaq's important to the Heats on and off the court. All his teammates look up to him and he gets along well with the staff. There's no reason why he would be traded.
2006-12-17 20:52:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Saffren 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shaq, who's the other guy?
2006-12-17 21:53:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Awesome Bill 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
SHAQ
2006-12-17 18:24:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by jason c 1
·
0⤊
0⤋