2006-12-17 17:03:19 · 12 answers · asked by Lil Reg 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
It's all about supply and demand. If defensive is what's needed and the cream of the crop ... OF COURSE. Offense sells tickets, defense wins games.
2006-12-17 17:08:11 · answer #1 · answered by MyPreshus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the team. If your offense is working then you don't need to change it next season. A team like Cincinnatti or Tennessee will probably pick up defenders early in the draft next year. For teams like Oakland and Detroit, who will probably get the first draft picks, it's hard to see what they will draft because they need so much work.
2006-12-17 21:55:13 · answer #2 · answered by Jason 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
have you ever appeared in any respect the awards, that He received in college? also, being a sturdy quarterback, has to do with a lot more beneficial than, stats. yet, in case you insist on in accordance with stats by myself, He were given His ring 4 years quicker than Peyton did. the Quarterback that, He develop into traded for on draft day(Phillip Rivers), has yet to get a ring. He performed damage in a unmarried activity and, now, he's meant to be this larger than lifestyles human beings hero? i do no longer purchase it. coach Me a ring or, flow abode. the objective of ANY NFL Quarterback, should be to win the large BOWL. you may have all the stats and, archives, that you opt for, i'd rather have the championships. Eli, is clearly a winner. that develop into the reason behind the draft day commerce and, that develop into the reason behind the #a million %.. it truly is pronounced as scouting.
2016-11-27 01:29:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because defense is so much tougher in the NFL so they need offfensive players to help them get by those tough defenses. Trust me, the defenders aren't any worse than the offense, they just want to score points.
2006-12-17 17:52:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure if the team thinks they really need that certain player. Although the texans will be kicking themselves for decades because they passed on Bush. The guy could be the next LT.
2006-12-17 22:56:09 · answer #5 · answered by jrollo76 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all you got to do for that answer is watch the tears running down the faces of those Texan players and Fans everytime Reggie Bush takes the field anywhere
2006-12-17 17:11:45 · answer #6 · answered by kenny b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he's what's needed yes. Even if the Texans did take Reggie Bush they'd still suck because their O line can't protect for crap so he would take turns with David Carr getting pummeled.
2006-12-17 17:13:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
id rather have reggie in a second....but i think it would be ok for a defensive player to be first assuming their offense isnt in need of playmakers but their "d" is but then again if they are getting the first pick they probably dont have good playmakers
2006-12-17 17:09:08 · answer #8 · answered by yea boy1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as he can prove he's worth it(and the team needs a player at that position more than QB or RB), then yes definitely.
2006-12-17 17:17:12 · answer #9 · answered by SPRdragon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, but it is waaaay harder to scout a defensive player than an offensive player.
2006-12-17 17:08:07 · answer #10 · answered by Tar Heel 4 Life 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋