I am well aware that Peta is a group of hipocryts and the money that goes into it does not go into the animals, but are all of their veiws really horrible.
Say nothing about eliminating pet ownership, it's a nice idea, but it would never work and would deffinantly cause more problems, so I don't agree with it nor do I want to hear about it.
I guess I'm moreso asking about pple with furbaby veiws on treating your pet much the same as you would treat your child making the obvious adjustments in techniqu*sp?*.
In other words, is it wrong to not consider you pet a possesion the same way your computor is *or car* but to look at it as a responsobilty you chose like a child?
And I'd like someone to effectively justify a reason anyone would look at anything as only the genetics that went into the animal.
Personaly, I don't know anyone that buys/adopts because of parentage, so i can't ask them.
2006-12-17
16:33:17
·
5 answers
·
asked by
mandy
3
in
Pets
➔ Other - Pets
I am an animal lover, feirce deffender of the common mutt, but you're only half right with the veg thing, I don't eat mamals.
But I wanna know that are the ideas of PETA bad simply because they are comming from the mouths of hypocryts *do I need to bring up the percentage of the animals that were put down compared to the ones that were placed, cuz I can do that with a quick websearch*
And furbabies are looked down upon, too, but I agree that a pet is like an addition to the family. Everyone in the house will need to put up with it and it has the same responsobilities as a child *healthcare, disciplin, schooling* so is relating the two that bad?
that may not have put it any clearer...
Are those that beleive in the concept of furbabies and agree with select ideas of classic PETA propaganda regarding treating animals well idiots because of how they feel?
2006-12-17
16:53:04 ·
update #1