No. This was not the first time it had been attacked. Has there been a lot of load testing for large jet liners on impacting the structural integrity of buildings?
At worst,the government hardly seems that organized to me. Look at everything else it runs badly.
And Clinton couldn't even get lucky in the Oval Office without the whole world finding out. People in the US get too much fame for being whistleblowers.
2006-12-17 16:18:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anathema 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well. For one thing I believe 9/11/01 was indeed as it was reported. Imagine a jetliner full of fuel crashing into a building at top speed. I'm surprised the buildings were not sheered off when the airplanes hit. Yes it could get hot enough to melt steel. Also all the furniture, paper and people burning is tremendously hot. It is what it is. Just feel for the poor families that happened to be in the towers that day. They are the victims.
2006-12-18 05:45:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by cheekydogg1 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
The word is hoax.
Your uncle is right about the kerosene/jet fuel, & also the diesel fuel stored in the buildings for generators. No matter how well controlled the fire from these sources, they cannot create enough heat to melt steel. Even raw coal must be processed to completely evenly melt it, which is why most blast furnaces use electric heat & blowers today..
It is theoretically possible for such fuel or carpeting, office furniture, etc. to warp or weaken it. However, that has never before happened enough to destroy a steel framed building into total collapse. The tower in Spain did suffer collapse of the steel outer frame (can't remember the name of the building), but it burned for a day or more before that happened, not within 1, 2, or 7 hours. The string of coincidences that occurred that day is also all but completely unbelievable. the link below offers further info & other links. I suggest watching these with your uncle as some of the video is quite disturbing, & frankly, some also badly overstate their case.
Thanks for insulting the kid, those who did. Really smart, not!
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
2006-12-18 00:29:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by bob h 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I do believe that 911 was a hoax or a conspiracy however you like to call it. I live in Brooklyn and a lot of people knew that there was something strange going on that day. It was weird that the media never talked about building 7 or how it collapsed. Most people who knew about building 7 knew that it did have any real damage and it somehow collapsed for some reason.(People are to ignorant to see that bush is a liar,and all he cares about is his money and getting revenge.)
2006-12-18 19:12:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by OBDallas 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I think it's a little suspicious that the steel from the buildings was whisked off without going through forensic testing...it was recycled quickly and sold to China. I find it hard to believe that someone moved that fast unless they were motivated to do so. So what motivated them?
2006-12-18 10:16:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You uncle is not a very good engineer, and FYI, hocks is a cut of meat. So neither of you are very good at what you do.
2006-12-18 00:12:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by lollipop 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep...was a complete hocks. (Sorry...couldn't resist.) The govt. paid Elvis, John Belushi, and John Lennon (who are secretly living in a luxury apartment on the Vegas strip) to arrange it all.
2006-12-18 00:11:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well we all watched it. How can you even ask this!! Yes it did get hot enough! Your uncle is an....never mind I wont waist my time here.
2006-12-18 00:11:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Psycmixer 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
9/11 was not a hoax* fuckyour uncle he's a commie.
2006-12-18 00:09:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by silverrubberband689 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope it wasn't a Hoax why do you think were at War now
2006-12-18 00:08:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by sugarbdp1 6
·
1⤊
1⤋