an individuals obligation to society ought to outweigh society's obligation to the individual?

Question

the debate UIL topic

Answer 1

I personally think that people want a society that will help them when need be - that's an awesome obligation. The individual is obligated to live in and contribute to that community (that is something he would do anyway - he just chooses where).

Peace!

Answer 2

When you say society, are you referring to a community of individuals, or are you referring to government?

I'm going to suppose you're referring to government, in which case, government has only 3 legitimate functions. These are: security of the national borders (military), security of the individual from violence (police), and enforcement of contracts (courts). Anything and everything beyond that is an infringement upon the rights of the sovereign individual.

10th amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the States respectively, or to the people."

Answer 3

The magic be conscious right that's "guy or woman" and how they are raised by ability of their relatives and their on the spot social and economic environment. Self sufficiency is a touch straightforward theory that has been with us for 20,000 years. As politicians (no be counted if elected or no longer) , their clergy, and media benefit extra administration in a given geographical section, this is of their superb interest to inhibit the assumption of self sufficiency in want of cultivating a % for all the advantages the politicians version of “society” provides you. a valid "society" could furnish distinctive strategies to the assumption of "criminal accountability" and reward self sufficiency. although, as politicians improve into extra empowered by ability of the individuals they help by ability of plundering from the self sufficient, the guy initiative of the self sufficient drops, as does their accountability to be obligated to "society." Such is the stuff of revolutions. no person “guy or woman” owes one whit to “society” different than to admire different persons and their inalienable rights to exist and be self sufficient. The burdens placed by ability of society on the self sufficient guy or woman would desire to be critically constrained by ability of empowerment to those persons. We don’t “inhabit” a society, it surrounds and suppresses us… for the ease of the no longer so self sufficient (to no longer be perplexed with those bodily or mentally no longer able to function interior the society, a ethical subject, no longer a political one).