2006-12-17 13:54:09 · 14 answers · asked by nazi19328 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because enough people were smart enough not to vote for him(Kerry).
2006-12-17 13:57:15 · answer #1 · answered by david b 4 · 5⤊ 4⤋
ralph b: stable ol' boys do no longer bypass to Ivy League faculties and connect the air nationwide shelter in conflict time... except stable ol' boys are somewhat fruity the place you're... They the two have not had to paintings a puzzling day of their existence... needless to say... so i will bypass on conflict adventure.. that week of wrestle guidance Bush have been given probably would not postpone okay to Kerry's months of easily wrestle.. kerry additionally has the attain benefit.. of direction Rove could probably hit kerry with a tranquilizer suitable earlier the bell rings and Bush could throw a punch interior the air as Kerry handed out...
2016-12-15 03:17:19 · answer #2 · answered by lacy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will give you an answer you won't like. Because of the so-called boat group and the way they portrayed that one kill as shooting a child. If any of the fat-A--, fought in 'Nam, I mean fought, instead of sitting on their fat rumps talking in a rear area, they would understand the rules. Anyone running from a fight with a weapon in a free fire zone was a legitimate target. Most of the first hand accounts describe an enemy trooper running with an RPG. A lot older than about 14, he refused to surrender and tried to use it by most accounts. That is a legitimate kill.
2006-12-17 14:22:40 · answer #3 · answered by Marc h 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the vote difference came down to the basic, personal level. Kerry came off as an effete snob. No trace of warm, fuzzy. Reminded everybody of their high school principal.
2006-12-17 14:25:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the electorate decided to give Bush a chance to straighten out Iraq in 2004.
To "stay the course".
And their patience ran out in 2006.
2006-12-17 16:27:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because, in terms of replacing Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor and Stevens, more people wanted Bush to do so than Kerry.
2006-12-17 14:01:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Everyone knew Kerry was a troop hater
2006-12-17 14:24:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Secretary of State in Ohio was the Bush's campaign chairman and, at the same time, in charge of the vote
2006-12-17 14:06:44 · answer #8 · answered by cwdc 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
because kerry was stupid and Bush was better
2006-12-17 14:11:11 · answer #9 · answered by angeldiva 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush was the better candidate
2006-12-17 14:05:11 · answer #10 · answered by Daniel 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Because more electors voted for Bush.
2006-12-17 13:57:34 · answer #11 · answered by nynameislying123 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋