2006-12-17 13:31:28 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. He is not a true conservative. He is a liberal..... and a half as*ed hawk. A true conservative would not allow his government to spend more money than it takes in. A true conservative would not allow his government to grow into an even bigger bureaucracy than it was before he took office.A true conservative would help the peoplr become less dependent on the government, not more dependent. A true conservative would bring enough properly trained troops and the right equipment into a war in order to win it.
2006-12-17 13:43:15 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. A president should be able to speak more fluently than the average member of the American population. While Americans aren't exactly intelligent, they are much more intelligent than he. Bush has sixth a reading level. He is the cognitively delayed sub-human no one wanted in office.
2006-12-17 14:24:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How you portray what he does and how it happens, NO.
But how he really does things, and how the world really works, Yes.
Its kind of easy to rip on him when everything you use as evidence is a lie, including ignoring testimony from general al sada, saddam's head general in the first gulf war, about the wmd's being moved to syria, and lying to old people about how the social security reform would have worked.
2006-12-17 13:34:37 · answer #3 · answered by Doggzilla 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you consider his "STAY the course",meaning, " we'll stay in Iraq,until I get out of office, then ,let somebody else come up with a strategy that will actually work...I'm not gonna take a chance on making myself look bad with "cut and run"........... then you probably enjoy his leadership qualities,as well.....
2006-12-17 13:57:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i replaced into too youthful then to properly known of it... George H.W. Bush replaced into something of a reasonable. He had to distance himself from Reagan, and coined the term "voodoo economics". yet George H.W. Bush replaced into an honorable guy from his militia provider, and thanks to that I easily have a miles better regard for him. As for Cap and commerce, i do no longer comprehend somewhat adequate approximately it to have a reliable opinion. I only comprehend Obama badly had to get it via, yet failed. previous that, that's a ineffective situation on the instant.
2016-10-05 10:47:50 · answer #5 · answered by schnetter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like GWB, I have doubts about some of his cabinet.
My idea of good - well, actually outstanding Republican leadership is Ronald Reagan.
2006-12-17 13:34:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bushes problem is that he has aligned himself with less the perfect people. He tries to copy Ronald Regan in his speeches and doesn't do a good job at that.
IF he picked better people and just was himself then you would see an excellent President.
2006-12-17 13:44:52 · answer #7 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
John #4 hit the nail on the head! I do agree with his assessment on Iraq! DEFEAT is not an option!
2006-12-17 13:43:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I like him, I like how his boot is up the terrorist *** and I like most of his political views, I also have a few points where I differ in views. But Mostly. I WUV HIM!
2006-12-17 13:45:21 · answer #9 · answered by nmmgb1993 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
On everything but spending.
2006-12-17 13:44:31 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋