well personally i dot think any is true. just a myth to like scare peple you know. they HAD pictures but the guy who took the puctures set it up to lokz like a locness monster in the picture. and i think the big foot they found foot prints and i think man carved them onto the ground and then tey found a video but they studiyed it and found out it wasnl;t real cuase they found out it was a man in a monkey suit lolz
2006-12-17 10:40:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
These creatures may well be real, but people only see what they are looking for, what they expect to see, and what they are trained to see. This is why an experienced hunter can see signs of game and know what kind of animal went there and what it was doing, while a city slicker may see nothing. Or why a doctor can look at xrays and know all sorts of things about a person's condition while most of us when we look at an xray just see outlines of organs and bones. Or, when I first went to Yellowstone park, I did not see any buffalo until someone pointed them out to me a few times, then I could see them. At first they just looked like bumps blending in with the landscape. Or, to take a more prosaic example, a person jaywalking had better be more careful than a person crossing at the corner, because drivers don't expect to see people crossing in odd places so they may not see the jaywalker until too late.
In the same way, some people can see Nessie and Bigfoot and similar phenomena, while others can be looking in the same direction but see nothing.
2006-12-17 10:44:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joni DaNerd 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
"So in case you have faith in international warming, do you moreover would have faith in Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, or that OFU's have crashed in Roswell, NM?" An the two correct question could be "So in case you do not have faith in international warming, do you have faith in Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, or that OFU's have crashed in Roswell, NM?" whilst i will admit Roswell is slightly sketchy, I won't circulate so a strategies as to proclaim it particularly is a large governmental conspiracy. I won't call out those that do, even nonetheless, be they AGW-proponents or no longer. there is an outstanding line between technology and lore, and that i think of maximum folk know it. And no, AGW isn't in step with blind faith. On a tangential observe, the Drake equation, it relatively is designed to foretell the form of clever species living in the universe, shows there ARE different life varieties obtainable. The no longer ordinary area is arising for the main suitable values for the equation. for sure they are all tough estimates, yet even the main conservative of such yield >a million estimates.
2016-10-15 03:31:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
they might be real or or a lie. they might not have been discovered yet if they are real, cause we don't really look for them we are to vague to check the terrestrial surroundings like, why haven't we checked the amazon completely, or why not check the bottom of the ocean and if they are fake, well the mind is a tricky thing.
2006-12-17 10:54:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by killer007-god of the sea 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are only seen by people that live in trailer parks and stuff, which means that they are real becasue they dont want rich and powerful people seeing them cause then people woud beleive them when they are seen it so only white trash people see them casue who would beleive them!!!!!!!
2006-12-17 10:40:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by bubbles 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
because people wouldn't travel to see just a lake with nothing special about it and the scots need to show you their lake and take your money.
2006-12-17 10:40:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
People see what they want, or expect, to see, sometimes.
2006-12-17 17:47:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Piggiepants 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe they have eyesight problems or their minds are playing games.
2006-12-17 10:41:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bao L 3
·
0⤊
1⤋