terrorism can can only kill a small limited number of ppl but global warming can wipe out populations of whole cites and countries. What do ppl think?
2006-12-17 10:31:33 · 25 answers · asked by w.m.d's_bro 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
global warming is offcourse, all this war on terror is a diversion to take the attention away from america as it and its close allies are resposible for 80 per cent of the global warming on planet earth,
2006-12-19 18:33:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Global warming is a passive problem with only one possible solution, stop making it worse. It's like the obese guy eatin' doughnuts thinking, "I'll go on a diet next week, it's not like I'm doing my heart any further damage between now and then." Whereas terrorism is imminent. It's like being shot in the a§ and thinking, "OK, if I don't do something about this right now, I could die!". Both have the potential to kill you. Just make sure that in the second scenario you're careful about removing the bullet. Because if you go in after it the wrong way, you've literally f***ed yourself!
2006-12-17 11:19:20 · answer #2 · answered by Sam C 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Global Warming is a farce. It is a theory. Terrorism is real. Muslims want to kill us.
Time for you to stop drinking the liberal kool aid.
Here is sufficient evidence to debunk global warming
1. There is a few hundred years of data. There are hundreds of millions of years of Earth's history. The margin of error is so great because the sample is so small. Any increase in temperature is inside the margin of error. Ask any statistics expert
2. Remember when the underwater city was found after the tsunami? It was underwater many many years before man had machines.
2006-12-17 11:24:40 · answer #3 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The problem is that we're fighting terrorism, but not global warming. The reason is that big money can make a profit fighting wars, but they erroneously think they will lose money fighting global warming. If done properly the cleaning of our planet can spur much economic development.
2006-12-17 13:11:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Global warming is a myth. Terrorism is real.
2006-12-17 11:26:41 · answer #5 · answered by Bill G 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Politicians are more dangerous than global warming and terrorism combined.
2006-12-17 10:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Global terrorism.
2006-12-17 10:35:07 · answer #7 · answered by Faux News 3 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Terrorism of direction. Any sparkling questioning guy or woman who has surely researched the unbias information realizes that the different would not exist and is in simple terms a ploy to garner capacity and funds.
2016-10-15 03:31:16 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GLOBAL TERRORISM which also can KILL or WIPE
OUT Populations of whole cities and countries if they
can get their hands on Nuclear Devices and Biological
weapons.
2006-12-17 11:26:50 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If we decide to use non-fossil fuels as our main energy source, we would not need to buy Arab oil and they would have less money to work terror on us...the main reason they hate us is because they perceive the West as stealing their natural resources...they hate Capitalism and if oil becomes a less of a central issue, they will melt away...we actually support the Middle East countries every time we fill our tanks...and many of them hate us...Americans support terrorism with their pocket book, whether they know it or not....Deciding to support anti global warming measures will lessen terrorists ability to affect us.
2006-12-17 10:56:53 · answer #10 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋