Social studies questions???

Question

Ok i swear I am not cheating on homework or anything, we have a huge exam and my teacher gave us a study guide that we could study off of so we would know kind of what the test is about. This is not for one of my grades, i just have a few questions i can't figure out. The book my class uses is Call to Freedom by Holt,Rinehart, and Winston


1) Results and important developments during the Revolutionary War.

2) Conflicts associated with the writing and ratification of the Constitution ( compromises, slavery, debate over the bill of rights)

3) be able to compare places in the US prior to 1877 to present day.

4) Explain the relationship between the Enlightenment & natural rights expressed in the Decleration of Independance.

Bay Bay: I have straight A's so I am pretty sure I am listening in class, what do you think?? YES I listen in class. this test is very hard it is over everything we have learned so far in S.S class, and it is worth over half my grade.

Answer 1

This will take a while
The result of the Rev. War was American was independent of British Rule. The treaty of Paris was signed some time in Sept of 1783 which was the Brits recognizing the American Colonies. This also showed other countries that wanted freedom from British Rule that they could fight for it.

Conflicts while writing the Cons.
The federalist said that the Constitution would replace the Articles of the Confederation and provide strong and limited government. The anti Federalist demanded that the bill of rights be added to be listed to point out what limitations that the government would have.

Compare places in the Us prior to 1877 to present day.
That would be just stuff like the different territories that you have talked about in class.

Enlightenment age is considering all people equal to pursue what they wish and to search for answers and have certain natural rights. Most of the people that were involved with the writing were rich men from England that felt they were of higher status than anyone else was. For example, a King is a King because of a Divine Right to be King. Not just anyone can be a King.
The Natural Law was opposing this thought that most had. Which is a great thing because of this everyone has as much of a chance to be a Judge or President as the next guy. These positions were not limited to only the rich or the bloodline like kings were.

This is somewhat sketchy so if you need anything else let me know.

You can IM me or email me I will help all I can.

Feather.

Answer 2

Emma, i have no idea but call up one of the ppl in your class and ask them to compare their answers with yours. also check to see if there is a website for the text book or publisher you are using, cause sometimes they include chapter summaries on those websites.
if that doesnt work, Wikipedia always has answers! For #1, just type in "Revolutionary War" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_war
good luck on the test

Answer 3

I easily have consistently been partial to President Eisenhower. He replaced into an incredible militia guy, and led the ideal alliance ever shaped. He made the Republican occasion aggressive back interior the South. His presidential kind, the "hidden-hand Presidency" replaced into powerful and did no longer reason various partisanship. He believed in united states of america, and served her his entire life.

Answer 4

For number 2, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Convention

Answer 5

r u listening in class hun? if not ,DO