2006-12-17 09:56:08 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
this whole thing was for oil and about 50,000 innocent iraqi people died and for the brave soldiers who are dying everyday
2006-12-17 09:59:23 · update #1
Blame the people who didn't vote. They piss me off....
2006-12-17 09:59:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
That's just plain ignorance to say it was about oil. I know that you can read more than the politcal propaganda of the Left. The problem with Bush in Iraq was that he didn't go far enough. Sure, we've not lost any battles, but they haven't been aggressive enough to hunt down and finish off the insurgents (that means, capture, kill or neutralize).
2006-12-17 18:40:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is a matter of opinion. In my opinion, the war effort has not been aggressive enough. I'm not sure the war was right in the first place, but we're there, we should give it a half ***. I want every single islamofascist terrorist dead. The rules of engagement need to be rewritten somehow to reflect modern urban warfare. That's just my 2 cents.
2006-12-17 18:01:07 · answer #3 · answered by chronic-what-cles of narnia 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
he hasnt gone far enough, he has to take the war to the terrorists in syria and iran
50,000 civilians died because muslim holy bombers use children and women as human shields, and target other women and children, who are also muslim. Saddam killed more muslims than any other person in history. now look at the people trying to fill the power vaccum, and youre against the one force in the world trying to save those people from certain death? and to give them a chance to save themselves and stand up for their own determination?
2006-12-17 18:47:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Trying to stop the killing of Innocent Iraqis, trying to bring peace to Irak, you consider it going too far. What do you want,, Cut and Run.. I don't think that's a good idea..
2006-12-17 18:03:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hello,
Personally, I think he is going to to as far as his secret society brothers want him to go.
When they finally say, "Pull the Plug", he will.
GWB, GHWB, WJC, RR, ect. are all just puppets on a string.
Once you realize this, the world will be in a whole new picture for you to look at. Those rose colored glasses of all who do not undestand what secret societes run our nation are all about, will turn to a smoky grey color.
So, this is my response to your question.
Hope this helps you................. : - O
2006-12-17 23:20:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your vast knowledge of foreign policy mystifies me. Have you forgotten what happened on 9/11? Lets just pull out and let the Iranians take over. You can then walk where ever, non of middle and lower class people could afford to buy fuel. Wise up!!
2006-12-17 18:10:39 · answer #7 · answered by HAAJR 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Its not so much how far he is taking this war. Its his enormously flawed plan for success. Bush is a failure, and an embarrassment to American's everywhere.
This doesn't mean I think we should pull out just yet. We have a job to finish.
2006-12-17 18:01:53 · answer #8 · answered by generalsmoketh 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well Harry Reid is OK with sending more troops. Ask him what gives, beings you all just voted against Bush and to get out of Iraq!
2006-12-17 17:59:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'm pretty sure that the people doing the killing are either Iraqi insurgents (and terrorists) or Iraqis.
We are not there to kill.
2006-12-17 18:19:35 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He has from in the beginning.
Other day Cheney said Rumsfeld was the best man we EVER had in that position. Come on now, the best and he has to leave in the middle of the war? We dont have brains anymore to figure out that fiasco? Who do they think we are?
2006-12-17 17:59:34 · answer #11 · answered by antiekmama 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋