is it real or something because it just seems like another pitiful attempt at overthrowing the WWE...thanks
2006-12-17 09:36:08 · 17 answers · asked by ryboyin 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
half of the tna roster is wwe people that sucked so they went to tna tna sucks.
2006-12-17 09:52:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The quality of their matches are much better than that of WWE. WWE is only good at telling complicated storylines. TNA is more old-school wrestling. By the way, to the person who used the "N" word up there....there is no room for a word like that. I'm white and like wrestling too, but don't be an ignorant moron!
2006-12-17 19:48:39 · answer #2 · answered by irish_mick_25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The wrestlers are better (in the ring!!), theres less drama, storylines and gimmicks they just let them go out and wrestle. wwe is taking away the best parts of wrestling- high flyers, hardcore matches, high-risk moves.
It's a nice alternative for the fans that remember when wwe was wwf and didnt suck.
TNA uses people like christian and Kurt Angle that were held back on wwe, and people like AJ. Styles or Petey Williams that wouldnt have a chance on wwe because theyre not 6ft5 and steroided up.
But the best thing about TNA is the matches. Any given tna match is a better match than anything wwe puts on all week. The only bad thing about TNA is they need a two hour show. Too much talent to fit in one hour
2006-12-17 18:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The WWE has been around the longest and has beaten many top competitors such as WCW, ECW, ect... TNA is no where close on the WWE's level. TNA has a full roster, but one hour which cuts back into 35 minutes excluding commericals. TNA is full of old grumpy WWE faces who were released or have attitude issues, or steroid abuse such as Kurt Angle, Rhino, Jeff Jarrett, The New Age Outlaws,
TNA will never be on the level of WWE. NEVER
2006-12-17 17:56:28 · answer #4 · answered by MrTokyoDrift 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yeah TNA got nothing on the wwe. Tna has been around like 5 years and the wwe has been around for many decades. So the wwe is better
2006-12-17 17:47:49 · answer #5 · answered by Matt: aka; Edge is world champ!! 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Its a new wrestling show and it will get better than wwe as wwe falls in about 5 years! Tna will be the prime time of sports entertainment! And tna is more real than wwe in my opinion!
2006-12-17 17:40:29 · answer #6 · answered by # 1 edge head (Mr DEDEDE) 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's just a professional wrestling promotion.It's just like the WWE,except the WWE is larger.TNA concentrates on cruiserweights,while WWE is concentrating on heavyweights.I prefer the WWE.TNA wrestlers are athletic,but their mic skills suck and they got no charisma.
2006-12-17 21:38:03 · answer #7 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is mostly WWE has beens the reason ppl r sayin it is so goos is because there r alot of ppl out there who dont like WWE and just like anything else
2006-12-17 17:51:04 · answer #8 · answered by marky_fightthepower 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
TNA has a bit more extreme matches and better wrestlers..well the wrestlers arent BETTER than some of the ones in WWE but they sure as hell are more atlethic!! especially the X-Division
2006-12-17 17:39:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I really am not a fan of tna.
2006-12-17 19:55:37 · answer #10 · answered by peterboro_first 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋