In real life neither,but Arnold in yours.
2006-12-17 09:43:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr. NG 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hilary Clinton its about time a woman steps up to the plate. She already knows first hand what is expected and how it is done. And um as for Arnold um not sure about him for a president yeah don't think he could handle it all.
2006-12-17 17:47:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Silly Goodgirl! 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
It would depend, I would have to see the debates and issues then decide. But what is up with people saying they would pick Hilary because its time this country had a woman president. That is idiotic. What the hell does gender have to do with qualifications? If anything, that is absolutely the wrong reason to pick her. I bet if you ask Hilary why she would want you to vote for her it would be, because she was qualified, had some experience, and shared your views, not because she was a woman.
2006-12-17 18:08:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Danny 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hilary Clinton. Finally , someone cares enough about our country to stand up and break the curse of no women presidents. Also , Arnold is not capable of running the U.S..
2006-12-17 17:40:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by dylanrocks013 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Arnold Schwarzenegger (who of course cant really run for Pres). He is a strongly leader, even though he has less experience. Im not convinced about Hillary though.
2006-12-17 17:39:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hilary Clinton. She's more experienced, and is legally qualified to be President as she was born in the United States.
2006-12-17 18:06:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Arnold is ineligable and Hilary is unelectable on a national scale.
2006-12-17 18:12:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by janssen411 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Arnold in a heart beat, he wouldn't wimp out when it comes to the war on terror. He'd terminate the terrorists
2006-12-17 17:40:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Arnold. He has a much nicer ***.
Source:
Terminator 3
2006-12-17 17:39:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Taffi 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Pat Buchanan.
2006-12-18 13:27:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Matthew 1
·
0⤊
0⤋