think of all time that would be saved by not going to the bathroom... maybe change it in the morning and evening???
2006-12-17 08:55:04 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Yeah for pee but I wouldn't won't to crap on myself. I do agree. Like when you went on long trips or shopping...lol
2006-12-17 11:23:40 · answer #1 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
But wouldn't everyone smell it? Wouldn't it be awkward walking around with a big dump smooshing up against your butt?
Also, when babies soil their diapers, the diapers are changed right away. You don't toss a baby in a diaper and change it just in the morning and evening, you change it when it gets dirty. Otherwise, chemicals from the pee and stuff will damage the skin.
Then you wouldn't be saving time, because you'd have to take your shoes and pants off to change the diaper. So you may as well just forget diapers and go to the bathroom.
2006-12-17 09:05:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lol. First of all it would be embarassing because diapers are a sign that you need extra help because the situation you are in doesn't allow you to go to the bathroom. That's why only babies and persons with certain handicaps wear them. If you can walk and use all your limbs, why not go to the bathroom???
Second of all, the existence of toilets and bathrooms would be meaningless therefore a lot of money would be lost by certain companies....
Not to mention that it would be uncomfortable and you would have that sensation that you're dirty all the time. At least when you go to the toilet you know that you've gotten rid of 'it', while in the case you mention, we would have to wear 'it' in our panties.... Pretty disgusting if you think about it, right?
2006-12-17 09:02:16 · answer #3 · answered by Cheshire Riddle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Diaper itself is a big pollution problem. The landfill are loaned with diapers
Btw, you will still need to change the diaper and clean yourself after #1 and #2. Are you going to sit down after you poop in your diaper ?
So no gain there.
2006-12-17 08:58:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
good idea, but no. you cant be tHaT lAZy... do you like to hold a baby when it just pooped? i didnt think so, it smells! smells like soiled indian food if i must say. its a terrible smell. think about how hard its going to be to talk to the females. think about how noisy they are, just sitting down and walking is going to sound like you are carring twenty plastic bags in your pants. the bacteria that will build up. the rash marks. the soggy or maybe pruney skin. and dont even get me started on three times bigger feces that baby feces... blah! AND... thats just another expense not to many people can afford. sure, it doesnt seem like much, but humoungus daipers will get pricey... it adds up. so unless your going to be carrying around febreeze and baby (i mean adult) wipes, its not going to happen. it wouldnt be better, sorry... good thought process though, but you were missing a few minor details
2006-12-17 09:04:45 · answer #5 · answered by mOnKEymAn 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, diapers!
And we won't have to change ourselves, we'll leave that to people doing community service, or we'll force the elderly to do it, see how they like changing our diapers for a change!
2006-12-17 09:05:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
But then who would change your dirty diapers? Way too messy. I'd rather just take the time to use the toilet.
2006-12-17 09:09:40 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Speaking from the viewpoint of an experienced home health aide, I say NO WAY!
2006-12-17 08:57:13 · answer #8 · answered by MsFancy 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yeah now that you mention it.
It would be so much better without having to use a toilet.
but we'd still have to buy a whole lot of nappies and still have to wipe our bottoms after a big dump.
And what about swimming? we can't swim in our nappies.
2006-12-17 08:57:53 · answer #9 · answered by Cuddly Lez 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Interesting suggestion
2006-12-17 08:56:52 · answer #10 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋