short step to lie to parliament and the British public? Hasn't the moral decline become so deep in Government that even if someone was caught shagging sheep in parliament they wouldn't have the decency to resign?
2006-12-17 08:53:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Public figures should behave in a moral and responsible manner. They are in the public eye and should lead by example. I don`t care what other people do in their own time, but,I do expect what ever they do, it will be done in full consideration of others. A person who has an illicit affair is a dishonest person, at the very least they are a cheat and liar. If a man can cheat and lie to his family (the people he loves most in the world) he won`t care a toss about lying to others( the electorate, other home and foreign ministers etc,)
The people who com mitt these affaires would have to work very hard to keep them secret in to-days world ,even if if they hope against hope, they will always be `found out` and they then disgrace themselves, their families, their parties. Exactly why they can`t wait until they are out of office, before they get to be so careless I do not know. Have they no pride in them selves and their `word of honour`?
2006-12-17 09:30:23 · answer #1 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Obama despises capitalism because he thinks that is incorrect with the help of not rewarding those who do not artwork as difficult or who do not make the right judgements on the right time. those who don't have any deepest sector experience will probably not carry a actual fix for the personal sector because they imagine organization vendors are basically made up of money and favor to tax them to fund extra authorities jobs.
2016-11-30 21:34:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shagging sheep is illegal (Sexual Offences Act 2003 s69).
I am unaware of any additional Statute that militates against "shagging sheep in parliament". Furthermore, m'Lud, I would maintain that shagging more than one sheep in parliament would be impossible, not necessarily because of the non-presence of such creatures in the Palace of Westminster (except, possibly, dead and cooked in the restaurants), but simply because the person bringing a very poorly worded prosecution has stated in his question the word "someone". Short of using artificial aids, shagging more than one sheep (if "shagging" is to be defined, as at common user, as an act of sexual intercourse involving penile penetration) would be a physical impossibility.
I rest my case, m'Lud.
2006-12-17 09:22:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I agree with you 100%
Our Liar...oops "Commander in Chief' Bill Clinton lied again and again and nothing was done.
Remember..."it depends on what "is" is".............disgusting.
Character DOES matter!
Here in the USA...the founding fathers would be rolling over in their graves if they saw what type of "leaders" are governing our country.
It's sad to say the least.
***
2006-12-17 08:58:16 · answer #4 · answered by Joey Bagadonuts 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ah would be put down to "research" Budget allocated and dozens of research assistants hired. Watching their antics on TV makes me ashamed we voted for them.
2006-12-17 09:01:06 · answer #5 · answered by naplusultra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is a crime then they should step down, but if it is a question of morality, then I can't agree, I think that morality is personal, and should not be subject to public opinion
2006-12-17 09:00:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They should have the decency to let us watch.
2006-12-17 09:14:26 · answer #7 · answered by KD 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You really are woolly, aren't you? You know absolutely zilch about the machinery of government or the responsibilities of Ministers, do you? Do some worthwhile reading and maybe then you can pontificate.
2006-12-17 08:58:09 · answer #8 · answered by artleyb 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋