Is it natural that the worlds only military superpower will become habitually cruel and overbearing?

Answer 1

People because of a natural desire of "divide and conquer" will always have that spirit in them. It's a human nature thing.

Answer 2

Communist China is a great ability. they have the biggest status military interior the international. they're 2d in naval length. the united statesA. spends extra funds on the protection stress than everyone else. Communist China has had the H-Bomb for fifty years, and that decide on club makes them a great ability. China has astronauts in area, so they might furnish H-bombs everywhere interior the international. China is #one million protection stress interior the international. the USA has the #one million useful protection stress strike stress interior the international. Logistics. cellular protection stress. able to go everywhere and everywhere interior the international. The Airforce has bases devoted to shifting in short classes of time. China nevertheless has a flow concern, and are not making an investment in this variety of mobility. I surely have been to China, and the purple look after is remarkable.

Answer 3

The means to real peace. No government admits any more that
it keeps an army to satisfy occasionally the desire for conquest.
Rather the army is supposed to serve for defense, and one invokes the
morality that approves of self-defense. But this implies one's own
morality and the neighbor's immorality; for the neighbor must be
thought of as eager to attack and conquer if our state must think of
means of self-defense. Moreover, the reasons we give for requiring
an army imply that our neighbor, who denies the desire for conquest
just as much as does our own state, and who, for his part, also keeps
an army only for reasons of self-defense, is a hypocrite and a
cunning criminal who would like nothing better than to overpower a
harmless and awkward victim without any fight. Thus all states are
now ranged against each other: they presuppose their neighbor's bad
disposition and their own good disposition. This presupposition,
however, is inhumane, as bad as war and worse. At bottom, indeed, it
is itself the challenge and the cause of wars, because, as I have
said, it attributes immorality to the neighbor and thus provokes a
hostile disposition and act. We must abjure the doctrine of the army
as a means of self-defense just as completely as the desire for
conquests.

And perhaps the great day will come when people,
distinguished by wars and victories and by the highest development of
a military order and intelligence, and accustomed to make the
heaviest sacrifices for these things, will exclaim of its own free
will, "We break the sword," and will smash its entire military
establishment down to its lowest foundations. Rendering oneself
unarmed when one had been the best-armed, out of a height of feeling
-- that is the means to real peace, which must always rest on a peace
of mind; whereas the so-called armed peace, as it now exists in all
countries, is the absence of peace of mind. One trusts neither
oneself nor one's neighbor and, half from hatred, half from fear,
does not lay down arms. Rather perish than hate and fear, and twice
rather perish than make oneself hated and feared -- this must someday
become the highest maxim for every single commonwealth.

Our liberal representatives, as is well known, lack the time
for reflecting on the nature of man: else they would know that they
work in vain when they work for a "gradual decrease of the military
burden." Rather, only when this kind of need has become greatest
will the kind of god be nearest who alone can help here. The tree of
war-glory can only be destroyed all at once, by a stroke of
lightning: but lightning, as indeed you know, comes from a cloud --
and from up high.

(translation by W. Kaufmann, transcribed by T. Rourke. File archived
at Lord Etrigan's Nietzsche site...
http://members.aol.com/lrdetrigan/index4.html Accept no imitations!)

Answer 4

No, because many of our leaders are too busy kissing every other world leader's behind, and apologizing for being the world's only military superpower.

Psst... most of them are (gasp) Liberals!

Answer 5

No more natural than people with low IQ's asking stupid questions

Answer 6

Of course. It's the bully mentality kicking sand in the faces of the smaller nations.

Answer 7

New Zeland isn't cruel

Answer 8

Hasn't happened yet.

Answer 9

Yes it seems to be.

Answer 10

I hear Chavez is taking refugees. Please consider such.