Does anyone agree that there are just too many PPV's a year
2006-12-17 06:21:50 · 17 answers · asked by Corey B 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
They should cut the PPV's back since they aren't really that good anyway with no build-up to them and plus cut the price by a few dollars anyway!
2006-12-17 06:57:30 · answer #1 · answered by Susan L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say cut the price. Cut it to half. then maybe more people will buy it. WWE is in a slow decline in quality. Kinda like how it was durning the period when Hogan left for WCW and when they started the whole "Attitude" Era. They always had a PPV every month. The Only PPV that should be $50 is Wrestlemanis and Summer Slam b/c they are the 2 biggest PPVs of the year. WWE is getting lame. And if you want proof just look at the last PPV they put on. December to Dismember was so lame. It was poorly promoted and the matches were not even that great. WWE neeeds to do sumthin to boost ratings and quality.
2006-12-17 06:33:55 · answer #2 · answered by soulblaze316 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I agree.
Now, there are too many PPVs coming one after another. Storylines and feuds that have the misfortune to start in between two PPVs have very little time to build up before, WHAM! It's time for a PPV match, and...why? Because...over two shows, he says he doesn't like you. Yep, real good reason, and real good storyline too.
Take Armageddon for instance. No suitable main event. That's why all of a sudden they bring Cena into the picture and make a tag match. Oh goody, one person who cannot wrestle is bad enough, and he's already a main eventer. Now, our good friend Roid-tista will be joined by Vanilla Cena, somebody who wrestles worse than him. Can any of you remember any PPV main event that didn't involve a main title being put on the line?
So many PPVs has forced the WWE into changing many of the storylines into "You have the title, so I hate you" or "You said this about me all of a sudden for no reason whatsoever, so now we will fight".
Well, either that, or the creative department's slacking off. It's probably both though.
2006-12-17 06:30:48 · answer #3 · answered by armageddon_arrives 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have alot of ppvs now, but you gotta realize that they have both Raw and Smackdown and they want to have their own ppv, Id say just end the roster split and just have one ppv each month. But they wont do that.
Also why the cost is so high is because the price to have a event on PPV is a ton of money so thats why they had to charge more, however, they should just go back to having it as $29.99 like before and cut down the ppvs to just one a month.
2006-12-17 11:29:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To all the people who say "just don't order them", I'd say I'm already not ordering most of them, but the problem of too many PPVs is adversely affecting the quality of the product for everyone. Back in the day, when there were less PPVs, they actually had longer to build feuds and storylines. Now it just feels like stuff is thrown together, then thrown out a month later to get ready for the next PPV. Everything's just so rushed now.
2006-12-17 06:54:23 · answer #5 · answered by combat_rock_1981 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pay-Per-Views. Just way too many and the pay-per-view quality of say "Bad Blood" or "Vegenance" isn't worth the price. Just making the fans spend money on an itty bitty bump in the storyline when the real action, the real changes, and the times the wrestlers actually put on a good show is at SummerSlam, Survivor Series, and the mack-daddy-Wrestlemania. But too many pay-per-views actually make the wrestlers tired and put on crappy shows and poor storylines.
2006-12-17 07:11:23 · answer #6 · answered by Beach Blonde 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BOTH
there are way too many ppv's and because of the price it's almost impossible to order all of them
I say drop the price back to 29.95
2006-12-17 09:56:48 · answer #7 · answered by lindarobin3 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think 3 brands: 2 ppvs each with another 3 of cross-brand. They should be no more than £7.50!
2006-12-17 08:04:17 · answer #8 · answered by Mike 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't know. Many pay per views = expensive pay per views. Try and send an email to Vince McMahon about this. Why don't you just mind your own business and forget about it? You don't have to watch it. If you are complaining about it, than just don't bother watch it. I do not agree and this question is just biased. I do not agree because most of those pay per views are free in the UK! This is Mr. McMahon's business, if he wants a thousand pay per views and he can afford it? Than go for it.
2006-12-17 06:31:00 · answer #9 · answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have john cena participate in wrestlemania darkish adventure conflict royal and eradicated 1st and characteristic yoshi tatsu win wwe championship in wrestlemania significant adventure adverse to santino marella with large khali as particular targeted visitor referee
2016-11-27 00:29:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋