Failures of the Criminal System.
1. Too lenient.
2. We believe that criminals can change. Most come from screwed up homes and others are just screw ups themselves who want an easy life. Should we feel sorry for them? Absolutely not. They made a conscious decision to disobey the law. They should pay. Those that engage in heinous crimes against children have been proven over time to never change. They can only be cured by death. To kill these people is the only way to stop the chain of violence. Man rapes young girl and allowed to live only to later effect another person and another and another. Those girls give birth to children with the same potentially hazardous genes and gives birth to more screwed up kids. In a generation we could see these people have a negative effect on 10's of 100's of families. The lives ruined by our weakness to make the hard but necessary to kill the perpetrator and all his degenerate illegitimate offspring. The price we pay as a society is then very closely followed by our cost to support the prison system and insurance companies with all the less than intelligent people causing trouble because they felt like it.
3. Apellate courts are 'in love' with helping degenerates and giving them multiple chances to waste tax payer money. This back log then builds and builds until it's years before they actually see justice, which they have forgotten what they did, or a mistake is made and they are forgiven of all sins and put back on the streets as a better, smarter, more careful criminal.
4. Pleading "insane." Regardless of whether you're retarded or just a little slow, you should pay for the crime. Remember! You should punish the criminal for what they did not who they are! Intelligence is irrelevant. Do we want a bunch of gun toting retards walking the streets, no. You give them a hug if you want, I'll be waiting to pull the trigger when one of them decides to break into my house.
2006-12-17 06:00:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Smacks 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whenever a society begins to have rapidly advancing poverty, crime waves, come right along with it.
Our criminal justice system has become a joke, with police officers shooting unarmed citizens in the streets, the mental institutions for the criminally insane have been closed due to drastic budget cuts. Our system always puts the most emphasis and spotlight on ignorant people. Society aggrandizes the bad boy/girl in television and radio making them into overnight icons. Our society contributes to the problem by rewarding evil and the basest of ideas, rather than reward, good citizens with money for college. Those funds are more quickly given to felons that will be nothing but educated barbarians. Society has the mindset that throwing money at a problem will change behavior.
Look at how long people like John Wayne Gacy and Richard Speck lived their lives in relative luxury. Speck even had a sex change and all the drugs he wanted while incarcerated. All of it at taxpayer expense. They wrote books about their brutish and horrific crimes, making them legends. These two facts alone, encourages more crime, in hopes of becoming rich and famous the wrong way.
2006-12-17 05:51:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sassy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm not sure about a larger picture, but speaking more specifically, I live in Nova Scotia Canada. Here we have a "Young Offenders Act." This entitles adolescents who commit crimes of practically any intensity to have their names' kept private and usually they receive little to zero jail time. There may be corrective learning applied but usually that is even spared. It's horrendous and from what I read and observe in my own community it basically gives young people free reign, there are places I would avoid in broad daylight unfortunately. So, this system in particular is weak and opens up children to lives of possible future crime. By showing these children they won't be punished the government increases the chances of them commiting worse crimes and doing so into adulthood. I think this is a microcosm of larger issues as well, some government actions encourage criminal behaviour (often even at a high level, with corporations and what not). This is merely one example however.
2006-12-17 05:37:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree that Portugal has the proper concept related to drug ownership. I additionally suppose that drug customers will have to no longer be dealt with as criminals. However, the intent of such a lot crimes isn't ailment, so treating all criminals as even though they're sick might make no experience. Many years in the past, the essential target of our prisons used to be rehabilitation. That target used to be deliberately deserted by means of such a lot jail strategies given that they discovered that the majority criminals can not be rehabilitated. Thus, the one factor they may be able to do with such a lot criminals is confine them.
2016-09-03 13:58:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by mesidor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is very little disincentive. The prospect of being caught is limited and they do not think the time is pushing them away from the crime. There is often little consideration to the future in the American system. This leads to more crime I believe because people do not consider the consequences of their actions.
B
2006-12-17 05:34:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bacchus 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The justice system. If you are growing up in a poor neighborhood, where there is nothing, and if the only consequences for getting caught robbing stuff is getting nice meals and a warm place to stay in jail, there is nothing to loose.
2006-12-17 05:35:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by caballero5792 4
·
1⤊
0⤋