Tony Blair's social policies have been extremely damaging to the UK. Unlike the new world, the UK is not historically a land of migrants, yet Blair seeks to impose mass migration without due process or majority indigenous consent? Who feels he should be tried?
2006-12-17 04:59:23 · 10 answers · asked by Ministry of Camp Revivalism 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
He has destroyed our countrys culture and economy.
Some could say that since he was elected then he has the right to govern how he sees fit.
However, we have to bear in mind that he has employed half the nation in the public sector and so is guaranteed thier votes aswell as those of the immigrants.
So effectively , the hardest working private sector taxpayers are paying the most tax to keep the public sector voting for a primeminister we dont want.Not good for the country but good for egotists tony and cherie.
Im sure he will see out his retirement away from the problems of immigration and big brother that he has forced upon everyone else desperately hanging on to power.
2006-12-17 05:11:59 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
It is a land of migrants though. Our entire history shows that we have been invaded by the Romans, the Normans, the Vikings. True British people are Celtic. The English language is derived from German. Then we have migrants from the West Indies back in the 50's. India and Pakistan. There are many migrants from Ireland. But then you have to think of how many British people emigrate. How many Brits live in France? The British Empire did a good job of invading other lands too.
2006-12-17 05:11:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Blair will prolly retire and move to Tasmania. He could be hauled back from there! Of course, maybe if enough people raise the call, he could be chucked out.
--Charles "That Cheeky Lad"
2006-12-17 06:41:48 · answer #3 · answered by Charles-CeeJay_UK_ USA/CheekyLad 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact he looks untouchable, yet you're maximum appropriate, the two he and George Bush could be performed for conflict crimes. different ex-leaders and their ministers have been interior the previous, what makes them above the regulation? If one human beings effortless human beings have been to dedicate a criminal offense, then we would get placed on trial and particular jailed, so why could the powers that be think of they might get away with it????
2016-12-30 13:25:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As the inscription above the Afghanistan Museum in Kabal says 'A nation that loses its culture loses its identity'.
2006-12-17 05:09:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Over the Invasion of Iraq..Yes
2006-12-17 06:01:20 · answer #6 · answered by uksawatdii 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Me and not just for this, he is a mass murderer and supporter of terrorist organisations, he is no more a member of the real labour party than I am a multimillionaire drug dealer like all his friends are.
2006-12-17 05:13:18 · answer #7 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, just like his buddies GWB, Cheney, Rummy, and Condie.
2006-12-17 09:00:01 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I absolutely agree with you.
2006-12-17 05:11:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
YES he should.
2006-12-17 07:01:18 · answer #10 · answered by 412 KiD 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋