2006-12-17 04:45:13 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
THe UK does not have a constitution.
2006-12-17 04:47:32 · answer #1 · answered by Gibaudrac D 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Great Britan, Australia, and Canada have what is refered to as an uncodified constitution. Parts of the constitution come from unwritten sources. This is not to say that they do not have a constitution. These countries rely on several written and unwritten sources to construct their constitutional law.
2006-12-17 04:57:13 · answer #2 · answered by Dude 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, I'm a Law Student of England. Will answer your question since its nature derives from my current law syllabus - Public Law.
Constitution rigidly theorized implies a source(s) of formal codified document(s) setting out the definitions of rules, principles of rights of the country. (example Constitution of the United States)
The term 'Written Constitution' unarguably includes every codified constitution, though not every written constitution is entirely codified for the significant presence of Statute(s) entails a part. (example Australia)
'Unwritten Constitution' a term often substituted for uncodified constitution is strictly argued to be incorrect for written sources are available (Statutes etc).
As of 2006, only three nations, Israel, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, have uncodified constitution.
That's the answer you're looking for.
1. United Kingdom
2. New Zealand
3. Israel
Wynne.
2006-12-17 05:42:05 · answer #3 · answered by Wynne 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
UK is the country which is not having written constitution.
2006-12-17 04:57:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great Britain and the commonwealth countries.
2006-12-17 04:47:08 · answer #5 · answered by robert2020 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋